The Grim Reaper Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 1)Everyone is entitled to post their own opinion on here. 2) I have made mine, others have made theirs. Its just a shame that the Grim3) Creeper 4)has to show his ignorance and lack of respect of peoples rights to their own opinion. 1) I never said they weren't. 2) Good for you, if you can do it, anyone can. 3) It's Reaper to you. 4) You can post as many opinions as you like, dosen't mean I have to agree with them. If I think you're talking out of your bum, I'm entitled to tell you so. A forum enables people to exchange their differing points of view, it's not my fault that yours were complete cobblers. Right well I've wasted enough of my precious time trying to mop your tears up, feel free to call me all the horrible names you can think of & if I can be ar*ed I might ammuse myself reading them later. Oh & if anyone else dosen't agree with my opinions then tough, don't read them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyinRyan Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 I thought it was a harsh decision to exclude Pedersen and despite what anyone says about him he is great TV. Surprised no one has mentioned how Crump completely took out Bjerre in the semi at the start line, how that was not re-run I just don't know or are you allowed to come out of the gate at 45 degrees to the right these days? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wackie Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 1)Everyone is entitled to post their own opinion on here. 2) I have made mine, others have made theirs. Its just a shame that the Grim3) Creeper 4)has to show his ignorance and lack of respect of peoples rights to their own opinion. 1) I never said they weren't. 2) Good for you, if you can do it, anyone can. 3) It's Reaper to you. 4) You can post as many opinions as you like, dosen't mean I have to agree with them. If I think you're talking out of your bum, I'm entitled to tell you so. A forum enables people to exchange their differing points of view, it's not my fault that yours were complete cobblers. Right well I've wasted enough of my precious time trying to mop your tears up, feel free to call me all the horrible names you can think of & if I can be ar*ed I might ammuse myself reading them later. Oh & if anyone else dosen't agree with my opinions then tough, don't read them. Getting more & more suspicious that GR is in fact Pedersen in disguise! Don't think anyone has dismissed your opinions Reaper, your the one who's attacking anyone who dares to think Pedersen is anything less than a god and can do or say whatever he likes. Obviously your friendly with a Mod on here, as previously your sort of behaviour would have provoked a warning and a Mod note against your posts! I'm very tempted to get myself a warning by telling you exactly what I think about your posts over the past few days, but maybe I'll wait a while to see if one of the Mods does step in (shall I hold my breath? ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trees Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 That's speedway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight_Lady Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Getting more & more suspicious that GR is in fact Pedersen in disguise! Don't think anyone has dismissed your opinions Reaper, your the one who's attacking anyone who dares to think Pedersen is anything less than a god and can do or say whatever he likes. Obviously your friendly with a Mod on here, as previously your sort of behaviour would have provoked a warning and a Mod note against your posts! I'm very tempted to get myself a warning by telling you exactly what I think about your posts over the past few days, but maybe I'll wait a while to see if one of the Mods does step in (shall I hold my breath? ) Don't be silly Wackie how many "you knows" have there been It's pointless replying to The Grim Reaper as all he/she wants to do is bad mouth other people and their opinions and is thriving on the responses. Though you may well be right about why the posts still stand without a warning when others have indeed been warned for far less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 I didn't realise people could see others warning levels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Milly Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Grim Creeper sounds good, as she must be onto something the way she defends Nicki. Must be a she. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grim Reaper Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Obviously your friendly with a Mod on here, as previously your sort of behaviour would have provoked a warning and a Mod note against your posts! I'm very tempted to get myself a warning by telling you exactly what I think about your posts over the past few days, but maybe I'll wait a while to see if one of the Mods does step in (shall I hold my breath? ) Not friendly with anyone. I didn't join the forum to make friends. Please feel free to tell me exactly what you think of me. I really couldn't care less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grim Reaper Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 It's pointless replying to The Grim Reaper as all he/she wants to do is bad mouth other people and their opinions and is thriving on the responses. Though you may well be right about why the posts still stand without a warning when others have indeed been warned for far less You couldn't be further from the truth actually. I don't intentionally badmouth anyone, I just tell them if I disagree with them. As for getting warnings/banned etc. what for? The only person I have attacked personally has now been banned & I make no apology for what I said to him. Is telling someone I think they're talking cobblers a personnal attack? I don't thrive on replies because I couldn't give a stuff if anyone replies to my posts or not. If the mods feel like warning or banning me then that's up to them. Oh & yes, I might well be Nikki Pedersen or indeed female, who knows? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight_Lady Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 I didn't realise people could see others warning levels I wasn't talking about individual warning levels. I was talking about the tone of the posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liontamer Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Reaper, you really are a 24 carat plonker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Though you may well be right about why the posts still stand without a warning when others have indeed been warned for far less Just wondered what made you say that then thats all when warning levels aern't visible. No matter, obviously a misunderstanding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Addison Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Lioness did you get the e-mail i sent you last week regarding your question ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Phillip! I take it you didn't get my reply? Gimme half an hour and I will send again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Pedersen deserved to be excluded, a fact that even he would surely acknowledge if he saw the video. In fact, Tony Steele's only faulty decision was failing to stop the race and exclude Hancock. That Nicholls didn't go down is irrelevant - he should have been excluded for cutting up another rider, even though it was accidental (due to hitting a rut.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Addy Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Reaper, you really are a 24 carat plonker. Not quite the jolly person we'd like on here, eh LT. Never mind perhaps he's gone back in his box. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dwn Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 Strange some thinks Nicki's exclusion was right... Crump himself apologised for his "acting"... Read Nicki's comments to the exclusion on his website. NickiPedersen.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trees Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 No it actually says Jason kind of apologised so that's an open ended comment. Also says that Nicki thinks Jason is a good actor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garf Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 No it actually says Jason kind of apologised so that's an open ended comment. Also says that Nicki thinks Jason is a good actor. He also says it is all part of the game and the show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dwn Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 I actually wrote it so I know what he means and said... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.