XTC38L

yes out of state riders count, they cant just declare their top 4Top 4 from each state are as follows. NSW. Kurtz, Fricke, Masters and Nelson. QLD. Grajczonek, Allen, Nelson and Douglas. SA. Doyle, Tungate,Sedgmen and North. VIC. Masters, Sedgmen, Fricke and North. WA. Heeps, Dan Winchester, Scoble, Ballantyne.

but are they applying for a new visa or are they applying to have the current one reinstated?

jake allen, josh bates, arthur sissis

originally that was thought to be the case but the riders were later infomed that it was the sponsorship certificates had been cancelled and the visa's were currently suspended.

It will be interesting to see how things pan out as riders like Poole, Campton and Manzares still had current visa's with one or more years left. So aslong as they met the requirements when the visa's were issued they should be ok. If they were forced to apply for new ones then that will cause issues.

and had serious injuries both seasons.

you would think so but the same clubs were bring riders in on a 5 when they clearly should have been a 7

The main problem is none of the riders know exactly what the current requirements are. The general consensus was that the requirements were top 4 in state championship or qualifying for your national final.

I dont think it has to be held in the state itself but it does need to be a legitimate meeting sanctioned by the governing body

sedgmen qualifies as he finished top 4 in victorian titles And this will start happening again if that is the requirements for a visa.

the only thing its full of is journey men NL riders that couldnt make it. I totally agree that there are quite a few foreign riders that shouldnt be there but kicking them all out is ridiculous. I think the current ruling of a 7pt ass ave is a good thing as the standard of rider will be much better and if they cant make the 7pt ave in 3 years there finished and thats the way it should be. The likes of penfold, o'malley, horwood etc should never been given visas as they never were good enough at home and clubs were taking ridiculous risks with them.

thats all well and good but what british kids are you going to replace them with. Until the NL is used as a breeding ground for young riders nothing will change. The NL should be for developing new riders not a career path for riders that couldnt make it a PL level. No one over 25 should be riding in NL unless they are new to the sport and no rider should be able to continue to ride NL for more than 5 years. Back the kids and give them a chance and it wont be long before there is plenty of young brits capable of holding their own at PL level.

not necessarily, it will just mean they will be paid less per point or they could be payed a weekly wage instead.

haha Fosters, the aussie beer that no real aussies drink

Poor muddlo is throwing his toys out the pram on twitter now. Phillipsr8'so replys are golden

no we are off building the gallows ready for monday

Poor little Starman, those blue tinted specs you wear must be as thick as coke bottles #Ward2race2016

no its called due process. Anything involving lawyers is always a drawn out affair

Perhaps they need the weekend to build the gallows

#WARD2RACE2016

pmsl

He looked much better last night. Still a long way to go but showed signs of it starting to come together for him He looked much better last night. Still a long way to go but showed signs of it starting to come together for him

watt is on a different visa. ie not a sporting one he has residency. All tier 2 visas are affected

Id be more worried about guys like atkin, mason and all the other riders that are 30yrs plus in the naitional league taking spots from the riders it was created for.

name them!