magnus

Ask Lewy. He's bound to know..

Is this the same rider you made unsubstantiated comments about before the start of last season? Throwing more stones from your glass house again..

Thats speedway. Same said about all riders at different stages of their racing..

Yes, I saw Mark Jenkinson and family watching a few times over the last couple of seasons. He also did a bit of sponsorship by sponsoring a fence board. So maybe Josh wants to do his bit and help the Comets. If anyone knows him they should maybe mention it to him.

I think a return to Workington for Connor, may just rekindle his love for the sport 🤷‍♂️

I heard at the Leicester meeting tonight Workington require a new air fence for next season??

Absolutely, read your post 😶

🤣🤣 Put your dummy back in. I only gave my opinion and I would have said the same regardless of which ever team it may have been.

No different to a league meeting, when one of your opposition heat leaders is unavailable for circumstances outside the rule book. Should they be allowed to replace him with a rider of a similar average? instead of having to use an unattached rider from the league below? that to weakens the field and becomes a lesser spectacle. (Just my opinion)

I have never disputed that's the rules. In your original post you eluded that the rules being ambiguous. All I am saying if they are, then they possibly need to be considered for change. Not an illogical suggestion, just my opinion on a public forum.

I merely said that in my opinion the rules should be looked at, so that the rider with the next highest rider is considered over a rider who has just been signed. If the unfortunate circumstances prevail that a second string or reserve is the only option available then yes. Do you think when one of your opposition heat leaders is unavailable for a league meeting, for circumstances outside the rule book that you should be allowed to replace him with a rider of a similar average? instead of having to use an unattached rider from the league below? that to weakens the field and becomes a lesser spectacle.

I have not disputed that's the rules, therefore Anders is allowed to ride. I have indicated in my opinion the rules should be looked at for future events and amended if the powers that be so see it. Just like I have neither stated Glasgow have strengthened the team by signing Ander's or pulled a fast one 🤷‍♂️

So be it if that's the rules. Its unfortunate that Leon Flint or any rider who's average descends in order is unavailable (Leon's unavailability is exceptional circumstances by the way) therefore, if Jack Smith is the next rider in line, then yes..

I didn't imply Glasgow have pulled a fast one or taking advantage of ambiguous rules. I'm just stating that any team regardless of replacing a rider through injury or illness, should be represented by a rider who has been established team member prior to a prestigious event.

I don't think its right that a team can sign a rider just weeks before a Championship event (or Premiership) and he gets preference over established team riders in a prestigious meeting. You would have thought they would have to ride in a minimum number of meetings (guest bookings do not count) as a signed on team member, (4/6 meetings home & away in total maybe??) before getting preference over riders who have turned out for their team week in, week out prior to the event. I know averages dictate who rides, but establish a minimum number of meetings to be considered for future events.. (Glasgow by the way and my opinion)