Ipswich Jules

Not quite sure of the relevance of your first part? I'd push back if he was behind me? Why would I "push back" if a blatent troll was stood behind me? You sound like you're almost jealous? Whatever you and Dicker get up to is none of my business and nor do I want to know! "Edinburgh Monarchs ‏@EdinMonarchs Mission accomplished for the Scotwaste Monarchs defeating Ipswich by 48 to 42 and we remain on course for the playoffs" My humble apologies, I put "on target" when I should of put "on course" - how terrible of me! Still, if their mission was to give up a point to their rivals for the play off spot then well played, very well played, we took that point. One more than you got at Foxhall last night. Thanks

What a surprsing post from the troll - good to see you being so supportive of the team you claim to support! *Awaits for the "I don't wear rose tinted glasses / I'm a realist" comments* Our season was very bright before the season started - go and have a look at the thread on here who people were tipping, a lot of fans from other teams were fancying us to do well. We suffered with the injuries to Morten and Taylor in the first meeting.

Not Rye House, think Plymouth....

You can't have the riders in the second string and reserves that we do and with a 8.5pt+ number one let alone two! There is a points limit you know!

Or like a Number 1 who's riding for a team place next season - like Miskowiak used to do around this time every season.....

I wasn't there mate, I was working

I wonder when Aljack will come along and tell us all how Nielsen was only used as he was "cheap" and how we only won because Rye house had guests and R/R..........

Yet you're quick to jump on the bandwagon when Jenga spouts more pointless crap about Ipswich not qualifying for the PL pairs - surely you wouldn't care we didn't qualify for the pairs or the 4TT as they are both egg cups? Right? Or, is it as I suspect, you just changing your tune to have yet another go at the promotion about a "lack of heatleaders" despite using YOUR OWN WORDS you would of also built a team with no "genuine heatleaders"! Such a troll, oh and a clown :icon_smile_clown: :icon_smile_clown: I wouldn't have Doolan personally, would like to see Rasmus Jensen given a look - wouldn't he be a 5pt assessed?

What Tocha said ^^ Just for the sake of making you look a twit again, lets assume we did sign Masters and Morris along with the 4 Aussies you approve of at the start of the season, so 6 of your team is complete and looks like so: Morris - 8.27 Masters - 7.52 Poole - 6.90 North - 5.83 Tungate - 5.00 Heeps - 3.00 Total - 36.52 Leaving 5.98 for your last rider - so you've also not gone with a "genuine No.1" as according to you they have to be a minimum of 8.5 - well done on proving you agree with the Louis and going for strength in depth!

Facts have no value with Aljerk, he lives in an alternative world to the rest of us, there was also the fact of a court case around that time wasn't there? Not saying Morris was involved in it of course but it could of impacted upon his availability.......

Would you take Masters if it meant dropping Poole and bringing back Hart? Yes or no Personally I don't see it as being stronger, leaving Heeps (who is currently injured) at reserve with Hart certainly would leave us struggling at the bottom end if Cam has an off night or take longer than expected to recover fully. I do like Sam and would love him to be a witch, but maybe next season rather than alter this years line up.

Sedgmen is full time EL with Lakeside, not a D/U

Haven't we been down this road before? You've stated on these forums that you'd like next seasons team to comprise Frampton, Poole, Tungate, North and Heeps - even with a 3pt reserve it leaves less than 8 pts for your "genuine number 1" which isn't enough as you say it needs to be at least 8.5pt average. So, who are you going to drop from your Witches 2013 team?

Don't expect a reply, he's the bane (embarassment) of all genuine Witches fans.

Ashley from Corination Street??

I hear the Dark Lord of Dorset is looming......

I wonder if we will be able to read it anywhere? I'd love to. I was unable to make it tonight as I've only just got in from work

:rofl:

:rofl:

And what do you think Rohan was bought with? Scotch mist?! Ipswich will use the money when needed - as the signings of Tungate, Heeps, Risager and Doolan as assets has proven - you may not agree with the signing of Risager and Doolan but it doesn't change the fact that the promotion aren't afraid to spend money. So you can stop bleating on about them not stumping up the cash as that accusation has no foundation whatsoever!.

Talking to yourself? I've given you plenty of reasons to your many complaints about the Witches team yet you still can't answer one of the questions I've asked you, instead you only respond to the posts that you want to see - the ones that suit your "rose tinted" view. Question: If you dislike the Louis so much, if Pete is such a bad manager, if the Witches are riding in the "inferior Premier League", if the track doesn't provide good racing since the changes, if you don't like the majority of the riders riding for the team - why do you go* and pay their wages? My opinon? Because you're a lonely troll who probably goes to speedway, says nothing whilst there, you quietly fill out your pgorgamme as the heats go - maybe with the occasional tut or cheer depending on how things go - and probably go alone. You're afraid to speak to the Louis or Pete or the riders in person - instead you go home and "speak" from the relative safety of your PC but when asked questions you go back to being "Mr Lonely" again who wouldn't say boo to a goose! I actually feel quite sorry for you Aljack = * = apparently

He's not right at all as he can't answer questions to him to justify his outbursts - we're all entitled to opinions but unless you can have some kind of substance to your side of the arguement then you really don't have a valid point. Morris was never an option as he rides for Swindon who are also a Thursday night club (the reason we weren't able to sign Lasse Bjerre at the start of the season as he wanted to ride for P'boro). Monberg wasn't available at the time we signed Lanham, and given the previous shambles of Monberg at Ipswich I doubt the promotion would of wanted him back anyway. He's only ridden a few meetings for Somerset so it remains to be seen how much of a good signing he is.

As you failed YET AGAIN to answer my previous question about your supposed "top end strength" team which you'd like to comprise Frampton, Poole, Tungate, North and Heeps, even with a 3pt reserve it leaves less than 8 pts for your "genuine number 1" - how is that "top end strength"? The answer? IT ISN'T! Face facts clown, you moan about "no genuine No.1 and 2" but the team you've stated you would ike to see built around next season leaves no room for those "genuine No.1 and 2" that you've bleated on and on about for the past god knows how long! So this comes down to one of two couple things: 1) You're admitting that you're wrong and the Louis are right with regards to team building (as you share the same team structure for next season) 2) That you're nothing but a troll Which one is it?

So Risager and Lanham between them get 26 points from the 43 which seems perfectly decent to me, on average that's 13 pt's each - so which of the remaining 5 should we "prune" before next season?