iand

Doyle £50 more Zmarzik £50 more Zagar £50 more

Good luck to Tom Brennan in the final

Bloody stupid way of doing it, I have always looked at the Greensheet average section for the riders new average.

Latest set of averages on BSPA website shows MPT at reserve.

Hancock £50 more laguta £50 more zmarzik £50 less

Sayfutdinov £50 less Lambert £50 less

Liked the pairs format in general, needs slight alteration. My suggestion would be 2 day final, 7 teams day 1 , top 5 teams to meet each other twice on the 2nd day. The 5 teams ride against each other once on the 2nd day which is 10 heats, then to have the draw made for the 2nd set of 10 heats with the draw being manipulated so that 3rd races 4th in ht 19 and 1st to race 2nd in ht 20, Team with most pts wins. In the event of a tie, aggregate scores over the 3 times teams have met in the final. If still level who had the most race wins. Big Tai fan but was surprised like most that he went for the win and not to try and help Lambert out.

Shanes does not like the Rye track, seen this quoted a few times.

KK to number from June 1st,

Milik 20 less Zagar 20 more Lindgren 40 more Hancock 40 more

Was on gate 3, would that be a white or green helmet cover. Personally no idea on a FIM meeting which one it would be.

Strange how at the beginning of the season everyone was saying that Clegg was on a force average, should have been over 3 instead of his 2, now we would be glad if he could score that 2 average.

I thought Pearson/Tatum said during the 1st GP that the pairs team had to be announced before the next GP.

Good to see Harris given another chance. In fine form at the moment

Lindgren 20 more pederson 20 more Hancock 20 more Holder 20 more

I saw something on the National League Facebook site which showed comments by Cockle which included Foul and abusive language , he used the F word a few times and called someone a C. No stars or asteriks used the full words. Not something that should be written on a family FB site like that. It was on there about a week ago before getting removed by the administrator after complaints about it. Most of it was aimed at a Speedway Promoters partner. I can only guess that the ban was for that.

Richards only scored 14 pts from his 12 programmed rides this season, not had the best of times before last night, he is at 6 which is the harder of the 2 reserve positions. Plymouths team built on 4 x 4 pt riders so should always have a decent reserve but will lack strength in depth unless 1 of them steps up to the 3rd heat leader role.

Sure reserve switches are still allowed, could have cost Eastbourne the win. Not sure what happened regarding Kelsey's bike, couldn't understand why he didn't use someone's else bike in his scheduled 2nd ride and then came out late and missed the 2 mins in Ht8 on Marks bike, mistakes like that could have cost the Eagles the win. Devils unlucky with Cockle having a off night but overall a good meeting with Eastbourne deservingly just edging it. Edwards a fine young prospect.

Bowen 9.07 Roynon 9.67 Kemp 3.00 Edwards 3.00 Flint 3.00 Wood 7.61 Halder 3.49 38.84

1 British Final maybe

How many Prem meetings did BT show last year including the play offs and relegation final?

No one has mentioned George Hunter, I presume he is still looking for a team place, watched him last year at Plymouth and looked to really have improved since I saw him last.

So if Cradley qualify to meet Mildenhall in the final in September and Kemp and Jenkins and both have by then 7 ish averages. Cradley will be able to replace them with riders of that average from just the Southen section teams or the Northen section teams or both.

What happens to the Cradley riders averages, when their averages are updated during the season when riding for their parent club?