Son of Shaleman

The suggestion was the release came from Eastbourne press officer. That's wrong. As a professional PR that damages the reputation by suggesting the PR leaks. That's libel - in the UK, at least. That's why Sandie withdrew

It doesn't say maybe: It says this: Anyone thought that a press release with an embargo has been issued and that the Eastbourne press officer has jumped in to quick.

Dave - they are libellous statements. I don't mind debate but not when someone posts something that is totally wrong

You suggest by quoting a post - now withdrawn - that the "leak" comes from Eastbourne press officer. That's the inaccuracy and very damaging. If you read the rest of the thread you might see it has nothing to do with the press officer. The problem is you quote somebody in your own post - not your own words. Remove the offending quote that has been withdrawn

You only make it worse for yourself by continuing with the libel after you have been notified.

You were warned. I shall take action.

So you understand, in legal terms: You are now under notice.

Please delete this post. You are quoting a earlier post which has been withdrawn because it is libellous. You are repeating the libel and I reserve the right to take action against you personally in a court of law.