SUPERACE
Members-
Posts
1,451 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by SUPERACE
-
No the signed a rider on a 28 day contract which the BSPA approved. Do you honestly think that the BSPA didn't expect BV to replace that rider. Stop digging that hole.
-
Not really seeing as both had to do the changes before the league starts, you know as per the rules.
-
The BSOA justified it so.
-
Why ? Can the transfer window not be separate from the cup. Let's also remember averages in the cup don't count so there are clearly different rules for that competition. What you cant have is a rule that covers both competitions but choose to only implement part of it for the cup. I.E the transfer window starts at the beginning of the cup but the cup matches don't count towards the 25% of matches. So my original point still stands.
-
You've just contradict yourself or the rules are contradicting themselves. How can you have to declare your tea before the start of the season but then only make changes after 25% of LEAGUE fixtures. Surely if the start of the window includes the cup the the 4 cup matches must be part of the 25%?
-
Wow Chris Louis clears up the rule on transfers and still people can't accept they were wrong. Belle Vue didn't break any rules, Ipswich haven't broke any rules, it's that simple.
-
Really so have a look at the Ipswich press release on the signing of Ben Barker. Chris Louis talks about the transfer window being the reason he had to act quickly, it's clear the rule starts from the first league match.
-
That's just your take, you can't have 4 meetings counting towards the 25% rule when those meetings don't effect riders averages. I think it's clear that the cup is bring treated separately from eague rules.
-
I think it's clear the league cup doesn't count. Averages don't count in the league cup so how can they count towards the 25% of fixtures. Also for the 2 teams that go get to the final they will then have to ride 7 meetings before a change rather than 6 for the rest.
-
28.03. Aces v Tigers - Northern League Cup
SUPERACE replied to Col's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Zagar was fantastic for Belle Vue and was a genuine number 1. -
Scroll back through this thread and it will answer all the questions, or check Dan's Instagram account lol.
-
Give over mate you were trying to insuate that we would be bitter because we lost the league to Peterborough, hence you said " a Panthers rider". For the record MPT has always been good value around the NSS.
-
Why would any belle vue fans be smarting, were not Poole fans,
-
This is low even for you.
-
Worst post I've ever read on here, total nonsense.
-
As I said totally different circumstances.
-
What have Sheffield got to do with it. Let's see what happens.
-
Yes 100% my opinion, but what ever way you look at it, the myth of KB not turning up for the playoffs (especially for Belle Vue) is absolute nonsense.
-
Not how it works, some things have to be done in private.
-
We finished top in 05 Kenny was flying 18 point max in the semi at home then broke his leg before the final, won us the cup a few years back, and it was a wrong exclusion put us out that year in the play offs.
-
That myth again. He never let Belle Vue down when riding for us.
-
Why is it a wind up, its a forum for people to discuss all things speedway, and Tai was talking to Belle Vue, the deal didn't happen.
-
Firstly this isn't Twitter, I've never ever posted to say he was coming to Belle Vue, and the rest of your post just proves me right and totally contradicts your posts.
-
Nope your wrong, just because something doesn't happen doesn't mean the story wasn't correct . He spoke to Belle Vue thats a fact and you continually tweeting it was a wind up won't change that.
-
Sorry I meant Denmark.