Grachan

The thing is, this would have been known when he signed up for the Polish league. "That's speedway" actually sums it up perfectly.

It's amazing the power that Poland holds over everyone at the moment. Just look at what happened with Tai Woffinden yesterday. The problem is that one day the sport will probably decline there too and there will be nothing left anywhere else.

Didn't he ride at reserve for Wolves and have 007 on his race jacket?

Don't know the whole situation here, but everyone knows the Poland get priority on Sundays. It's why the Premier League ride on Mondays and Thursdays, as these are the days we get priority (or at least it was last time I looked). So I guess he would have had no choice.

Oh right. Swindon have got one of those too.

Why didn't Mountain use it then?

Seen replay now. Bad decision. Rowe was knocked off.

My first perception was certainly that he was wiped out but not seen a replay.

They just said on BSN that there is the possibility of Cradley Heathens returning next year.

Looked like it. Where's the rest of the air fence?

Imagine if they had just let it go, and stated that they decided to do so because the rule only says "may". A lot more of a corrupt looking decision than the one they made, which applied the rule as written. Besides, the rule said they may and they did. So where's the issue?

Bearing in mind that the rule is clearly stated, they had no other option but to disqualify him to be honest.

So, there are now no riders who have ever won a World Championship riding in this meeting.

Page 5 of this topic.

It would probably be better if it said "up to disqualification", like the other rules do. But the rule is there and this is the first time this has ever happened so they must know about it.

Went back to the beginning. Very little discussion really. Just "oh well, rules are rules" and moved on. Should be a major topic of discussion surely.

Watch from the beginning. Yes, apparently he wore "non-conforming" uniform during the qualifiers. Seriously? They disqualify him for that? Blimey.

Me too. Bizarre that they are now talking about tyre pressure instead!

Watched it on BSN. Well done Ipswich. And well done Adam Roynon for being the only speedway commentator on the face of Planet Earth who actually understands how speedway scoring works and that you don't need a maths degree to understand it.

I wouldn't call it a loophole. Surely a loophole is a way of getting round a rule or finding a way of evading it. So it's not really that. The rule is the rule and they have used it as it is.

That's right. He was. I remember the manner of the win caused quite a furore at the time, and I think it led to just one TR per meeting being allowed.

From memory, I think you could use 2 double point tactical rides per match at that time. Over the 2 legs Peterborough used 4 and Reading used none. Wasn't it something like Peterborough being 16 down with 3 races to go and scored two 8-1s and a 5-1 to finish? Something crazy like that anyway.

I don't even think that is the issue. That applies to all riders. The issue is that a rider is assessed the same in both leagues when everyone knows they should be assessed with a higher average in the lower league. Everyone except the promoters who voted for it anyway! I would be interested to hear from a promoter who voted for it and their reasoning behind it. I could do with a laugh.

It does kind of make you wonder where their heads are when they come up with this stuff, doesn't it!