Grachan

Do you mean this year's Premier League? Perhaps you could clarify that. Do you really think this: 1. Scott Nicholls 2. Matej Zagar. 3. Simon Stead. 4. Craig Cook. 5. Max Fricke 6. Steve Worrall 7. Stefan Nielsen Would struggle against this: 1. Craig Cook 2. Sam Masters 3. Justin Sedgmen 4. Kevin Wolbert 5. Erik Riss 6. Robert Branford 7. Max Clegg (Just taking the first 2 completed teams from each league alphabetically. Cook v Cook would be pretty close. Belle Vue's number 4 vs Edinbugh's number one!)

I think most of the talent was at Cradley Heath in 1983!

We may well have had the World's top riders here in the early 80s but only one of them was at Swindon. Or at least in 1983.

Two then. My main point is he shoud get the rest of the ban suspended and be allowed to continue his career immediately but have a suspended sentence hanging over his head.

I hope this doesn't get dragged into Darcy being cleared on some sort of ridiculous technicality. What I hope happens is he gets, say, a three year ban, with the time he's served out already being counted towards the ban and the rest being suspended. Then he can get on with his racing. He's had a long time out now and missed out on 2 cracks at the World title, which he probably deserved to happen. Hopefully it will teach him the lessons needed and it is clear to him he musn't transgress again.

I would think that most people who want to view a website on Coventry Speedway would type "Coventry Speedway" into Google and then click on the link. I can't see the .co having any real effect on that. how often do you actually type in the full address of a website you wish to view?

Interesting topic. Perhaps there are further categories to be had? But for me: Best gater: Bob Kilby. He didn't always make the gate, but when he did, boy did he! He's be about 3 lengths clear by the first bend. Best racer: Peter Collins. How about best team rider? John Cook. Never seen anything to match his ride with Lance King at Ipswich in the test against GB. Best all rounder: Hans Nielsen.

If you read through, you'll see that some people are saying both should be guilty. You seem to be reading things into it that aren't there. There may be a case for both to have been guilty, but there is certainly a difference in the two scenarios.

You don't know for sure, maybe, but it is enough to cast reasonable doubt. I only know from what is on here. I don't know the full details of the case. But that's how it seems to me. There is a clear difference between the two though. It does seem to me that the first guy is guilty of some form of aiding and abetting, however, with regard to the second case.

The case isn't about her being drunk. The case is that in the first instance she willingly went to a hotel with the guy, hence a degree of consent was assumed. Not guilty. In the second instance the guy snuck in the room, gave her one without her knowledge, and snuck out again. Sounds like rape to me.

From Halifaxtiger's post it's pretty obvious how one committed rape and one didn't. I'm surprised people are having problems seeing it.

The Yorkshire Ripper believed he was innocent. Doesn't mean he was.

According to the Defunct Speedway website, High Beech was still staging meetings right up to 1967.

I guess they must have agreed with her though. And Jessica Ennis is higher profile than Charlie Webster (both at the club and nationally). It's certainly not her and her alone.

It wasn't just Charlie. It was Jessica Ennis too. Plus several club sponsors, includng a company owned by boxer Johnny Nelson.

Not too many things wrong this year. the increased points limit is good, though could have been more than 2 points what with 2 less teams this year. Like others, though, I don't see why they drop the "2 points for a win of 6 or less". They say that home supporters were a bit upset if they lost a point. Well, durrrrr!! They're supposed to be upset. It's called sport. You lose a point, you get upset. And it makes the last heat scenario for the extra point much less relevant, because it only effects the away team. and away teams normally have about 5 supporters there on a good day for your typical league match. The whole point of the scoring system was to keep matches alive. But, if it don't have any impact on your own team, then it's not alive. Still, at least it will keep those following the scores online gripped. So, close to a good AGM boys, but no cigar once again!

Seriously? You honestly believe that because a woman poses for sexy photographs she is not in a position to condemn rape? I find that a very strange point of view. Do you feel, for example, that Richard Attenborough was not in a position to speak about human rights because he played a killer in films? My only knowledge on this is what I've read on here, but from what I can gather there were two blokes. One picked up a very drunk girl, took her to a hotel room, and gave her one. Very dubious behaviour to say the least, but not rape. The girl then passed out, is that correct? He then called up this footballer, who turns up, gives her one while she is unconscious, and sneaks out again. That's rape. Clearly. The grey area is that maybe she never actually said to him to stop or said "no", but in the first instance there was clearly a degree of approval given, but not in the second. As for making a stand against this, then I guess it's up to individuals and how they feel. Certainly if a guy does his time then in prison, for me, I don't see why he shouldn't be deprived of work. But being in a public position like this does make it a more difficult situation. I admire Charlie for taking a stand, though. Good for her. She's putting herself in the firing line of typical low level internet trolls so I hope she can handle them. Good to know that other people are also taking the same stance and she's not alone.

Very true, although that is more club specific.

I'm not saying if I like it or if I don't. It was plainly obvious to me that when it was introduced there was as immediate, noticeable drop in crowd levels.

I guess crowds have been slowly on the decline for a few years, but speedway was having a bit of a renaissance in the early 21st century. There were 2 moments that were real key moments for me. Two things that were introduced, and when you went the following season there was an instant, visible drop in crowd levels. One was when they introduced the Tactical Ride rule. The other was the 39.95 points limit. Both of these had a drastic effect and drove away many core supporters.

Japan did normal speedway until the mid 60s. It was then apparently banned because they saw the sliding as too dangerous. I've been to a couple of meetings in Japan. Must be about 10 years ago now. It's called Autorace and is raced, as you say, on tarmac. The racing is individual and it is very much a gambling sport there.

Blimey, if you start banning refs for inept handling of a meeting tgere wouldn't be any left!! Honestly, though, I don't see that as anything more than opinion on a ref's handling of a race. Even if, as you say, the ref should have excluded riders, it's not really a disciplining issue.

Nathan Greaves. Barely scored a point all year. Borrows a bike from Simon Gustafsson. Wins heat 2 and scores paid 8 from his 3 completed rides.

Facebook groups are what you make them. I've been loving the old pictures that have been put up lately. Anything that gets silly on there I just ignore.

I don't think the return of second halves would solve anything. Second halves weren't popular even when the sport was in it's heyday. I remember once they actually introduced some sort of competition for second halves (was it the Golden Sash or something like that?), with points being added up and so on, just to get people to hang around and watch, but most people still went home after the main match.