Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Badge

Members
  • Posts

    20,397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Badge

  1. The point everyone seems to miss is that Hans(I've used his name as you did) has never spoken to the press about any incident, unfortunately that is what Scott continues to do at every opportunity it seems. Also who is the one who pushes his weight around and throws punches when things don't go HIS way. Not the Danes certainly(and that explosive episode on Saturday night was straight after the event and verbal not physical before you say anything and forgotten about after the event as it should be).No Scott needs to become dignified, he is a good rider but needs to think more about his own behaviour before he casts aspersions against others, and that Jaybea is my opinion on this matter, I know you disagree and thats your perogative, that's what makes forums interesting.
  2. What like Mark Loram:former World Champion etc, etc,a real gent and nice guy.....ummm a loser, yeah right.
  3. "shock horror".......Not one of these posters is an Ipswich fan, whatever next
  4. Good post DH. Will this so called feud with Hans and the whole of the British Isles EVER stop, No I suspect not until Scott Nicholls stops stoking the fire Up until that very silly put down, I had Bomber down as Man of the Week, however he blotted his copybook big time, and so for entertainment value Tomasz Gollob gets it.
  5. Well then don't compalin when you hear a bit of bad language and venting of frustration. You can't have it both ways.
  6. If you have recorded the meeting Subedei, have another look as I think you will find that Nicki's kevlar got hooked around AJ's footrest, he did really well to get clear and still stay on the bike, AJ must have realised this and backed off to allow Nicki 2nd place. bobtasker I totally agree with you, this sticking a microphone in someone's face is farcical, what will we see next, Sophie running on the track to interview a rider who's just been involved in a crash to ask his view of the incident.The pits is the business end of the team and as such a no go area in the name of 'entertainment'. Just my opinion.
  7. Not condoning his behaviour, BUT perhaps the cameras needed to pan away then, oh no much too good TV for that.
  8. Strange really, a thrilling night's speedway, with the result in doubt to virtually the end and all anyone can do is bad mouth Hans Andersen. My personal opinion is that Sophie new exactly what the reaction of Hans would be and milked it 'in the name of good telly'. This is not a new reaction is it for goodness sake, just because it is Hans Andersen. I thoroughly enjoyed the whole event and at the end of the day the best team won and more importantly Speedway was the winner.
  9. Bit of a chauvanist then are we?Or are you truly threatened by the weaker sex?Where does it say on your birth certificate that you shall know everything about everything and that the female sex shall defer to you alone People see things differently.What one person sees as dangerous another can't see the problem, that is life.At the end of the day, Scott beat Hans, neither rider was hurt so get over it.
  10. Just because that doesn't happen to be your philosophy, doesn't mean she didn't have freedom of choice, that is her perogative surely.All sports men, singers actors etc etc have groupies and the Danes are obviously no different.As someone has already mentioned there is NO LOVE lost between Hans and Scot, and all this posting on both threads and all the hype from the biased commentary on Sky has fueled this long running saga again. It was racing for your country, trying to qualify for the World Cup final.You will always have split opinions about riders etc., however, just because someone favours say Hans over Scot does NOT mean that they don't support GB. Freedom of choice in our little island. And at the end of the day Scot BEAT Hans.
  11. Actually I was nearly sick over a Dane last night, I was eating my supper watching on TV and they cut to a picture of Nicki P stripped to the waist, sweat streaming and blower on...yuck!! not a pretty sight TBH.
  12. Stress....stress, you want stress Point taken. The other side of the coin you have to consider is not all posters are in fact British even though they live and were possibly born over here.
  13. Has Chris been drafted into the team then, as from seveal posts it seems he has?
  14. Who is this directed at precisely? The females on this forum I suspect.Not all the males who lust after Sophie Blake then. Rather a stupid thing to say really, I think you will find that 'most' Brits support team GB, but not all with "Blind Faith" and rose tinted specs.
  15. Well said Boxer, once again Nicholls showed his true colours. For goodness sake he won the damn race, just a little hand shake but oh no.
  16. Blimey what a let down that was after Sunday night's thriller. Couple of odd decisions by the ref against Denmark, both involving Charlie, but the tapes farce again, very strange . Think GB might find it hard to qualify on Thursday now, however I hope I'm wrong as I've called both these rounds wrong
  17. Thank you it's quite clear when it's explained to me.
  18. Right as it was me that started this, perhaps it is quite literally like this: heat 22 - Gollob is a Tactical substitute for Jagus. heat 24 - Gollob in his own heat is tactical joker. Is this correct.? Whilst I can see this is actually a 'grey' area, I can see how they got away with it I think.!! If taken literally this rule should have stopped this happening, as although one heat was his own, he actually was nominated for 2 tacticals.
  19. You are too kind Mr S. However if you go to page 21, where the Tacticals are to be found, I would be grateful of some help.The last paragraph states and I quote: "No rider will be permitted more than one nomination, either as a Tactical substitute or as a Tactical joker" Am I taking this too literally or should Tomasz have done either/or and not both.As I said your help would be appreciated. Thanks Badge.
  20. Sorry I wasn't trying to be controversial at all, merely asking why this is allowed that the same rider in effect has 2 tactical rides?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy