chunky

What is sad is that you still insist on insults and name-calling, yet you call ME the bully?

Apologies mean absolutely bugger all if you turn around and then repeat that kind of nonsense the next day - which you invariably do. Exactly what "co-operation" do you want from me? You are the one who insists we are "at war", yet I have repeatedly told you that we are not. I don't like some of the stupidity you post, but that doesn't mean I hate you or have a problem with you. I have a problem when you resort to insults and name-calling, and I have a BIG problem when you lie and falsely accuse me of things, but if you don't do that, everything is cool. I have had some problems with iris123 in the past, but we sorted that out like adults. Even so, that doesn't mean we always agree on things, but that is fine.

It would help matters if you tried to act in an adult manner when engaged in discussion, and to read what is being said. Here are some FACTS: 1) Online forums and groups usually have rules and guidelines. Not just about general behaviour and attitude, but things like NO multiple accounts, NO spamming etc. 2) Gustix has broken these rules on the BSF (on more than one occasion), and is punished accordingly. What I have said here is that "I don't understand why he does things like that", and I really don't. Do you? There is absolutely nothing critical or derogatory in that statement. I have said many times (both publicly, and to him personally), that John is - and SHOULD be - a valuable member of the BSF. Why he resorts to breaking rules, or even bending them, is beyond me. Yes, I genuinely HAVE tried to help John, because he needs it sometimes. Recently, he was blatantly posting copyrighted photos on here, and I advised him that he couldn't do that without permission. Whatever you think my opinion of him is, I honestly don't want to see him getting into serious legal trouble (which he can do with things like that). It can also reflect badly on the forum as a whole. There is nothing that I have said here that is FALSE, or that can be construed as arrogant.

I'm sorry, but it is fact. There are rules on online forums and groups for a reason, and John has been shown to break these rules on multiple occasions. I'm not taking any pleasure in saying it, which is why I have actually tried to help him. Despite what you may think, I do not hate John; I just don't understand why he does some of the things he does.

What I REALLY don't understand is why somebody like John does things like this? A lot of what he does is so ridiculous...

Thung to remember, Bob, is that by his own admission, John has previously been banned from the BSF (and the BSF is a lot more than just this "years gone by" section) for breaking forum rules. He has also been banned from a number Facebook groups. For me, it is really sad that someone who can be - and SHOULD be - a valuable member of any speedway forum/group lets himself down the way he does...

You've omitted a lot, Bob...

Remember, people don't want truth or fact; they just want someone to agree with them to "prove" their way of thinking is right...

He was visiting the BSF earlier this evening, just obviously not posting anything...

He made at least four appearances, but none in an official fixture.

What the hell are you thinking? After all, this is British speedway you're talking about...

Last visited the BSF about an hour ago. I have absolutely no idea why he disappears like this, and then pops up to post something totally off the wall...

I wouldn't worry too much; Doug has been called a lot worse!

Oh dear, Robbie... Iris123 is not a "her" but a "him"...

As did Stefan Salomonsson, Jim Dormer, Brad Oxley, and Leif Soderberg. I think we need to look at an absolute minimum of two teams for this thread...

Trying to be a smartarse, eh? I can beat Steve Bast with Timmy Joe Sheppard at Hackney!

While "a few", may not have been interested, I certainly don't feel it was as big an issue as some may claim. Plus, in the late 60's and early 70's, it wasn't unusual to have a "star guest" make an appearance in the second half; often a match race (or series) against the top local(s), and contesting the usual second half event. At Plough Lane, it was usually a London-based rider, or someone like Terry Betts. It must have been worth their while to turn up for a couple of races...

His career came to an abrupt halt in 2007 for being a naughty boy. There is more information available online...

Ah, okay... You know, I originally put, "where Pete Murray took Sverre off", then changed it - just to appear nice, and non-accusatory.

I was next to my dad! You must have seen him! Right where Sverre came off! Unless your memory is going... Next thing, you'll say you don't remember seeing me at the Lokeren Trophy either!

I was there for his British debut at Custom House in 1970. He looked good then!

Yep...

You are correct. May 9th, 2018.

Two more Welshmen to appear for Newport were Graig Gough (handful of meetings in 1999 and 2001), and Pete Rodger, who had a sole outing in 1975. Both were Newport-born.

Remember, Reg didn't ride in 72, but his form had been on the slide since his last year at Plough Lane in 69. Throw in the fact that Ronnie had gone, and Trevor had been really been struggling for a couple of years, I really didn't think it was that solid a team. It was really asking a lot of Bertola, Clarke, and Stape to really emerge as true heat-leaders, and of course, that never looked like happening.