I thought the issue was
A programme has more pages of adverts than text and is vatable
A magazine has more text than adverts and is not vatable
Sheffields racecard was all adverts and racecard so vat was due.
Whilst it would have been nicer to tell them earlier, I also welcome a new broom.
it has been really irritating as a fan to watch and hear the secret code amongst the in crowd of ‘we know whats happening but we aren’t telling you.’
Welcome to terraces and life on the other side of the pits fence gentlemen.
With George English retiring does this mean that Newcastle are classed as a new promotion and
1. Don't get to vote at BSPA meeting for 2/3 years
2. Won't get priority over other Sunday tracks
Applying for grants in England when they play in Scotland seems a challenge. If they do not think they can get back into the Scottish senior leagues why not move to the English Northern League with opportunities to progress up the English pyramid
Am I right in thinking that riders cannot be counted as 'assets'in the accounts as they could retire at any time. So the financial position of clubs with good rider assets will look worse. For example Poole used to own about 17 riders
To be fair, it makes sense to wait until moneybags Glasgow and Somerset have sorted their teams and the remaining riders will realise they have to ride for realistic money and not play teams off against the big twos deals
Struggling to understand this one.
Glasgow own the stadium and have no rent to pay.
Their main outlay is riders wages.
Their two top riders Craig Cook and Chris Harris both say they don't earn enough to pay the bills.
Glasgow lost over £100,000