Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

SPEEDY69

Members
  • Posts

    2,552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SPEEDY69

  1. Looked a pale shadow last night, shutting off way before the bends signals to me he's lost it and should retire. Sad but it happens.
  2. Yes, and shouldn't be allowed if he doesn't ride until after 28th, shouldn't matter when he's signed.
  3. I don't think it should be when they sign but when their first meeting is.
  4. Because then it's after the Scunthorpe fixture but before the Oxford one
  5. For 'authorities' read other promoters, maybe even those facing Glasgow in the days following.
  6. Forecast not great, can see this being called off?
  7. Being an old git I'm surprised you've not heard it before - I remember it from my childhood 50 years ago!
  8. Justified though because with his experience he should be getting more than 4 points as the third heat leader.
  9. Think I got that wrong! Kerr not doing it so far his rolling starts pegged back early by the ref.
  10. I see King is doing his best to lose it for the Witches
  11. Think that was the wrong decision, Gilkes did nothing wrong, Jenkins came back across too late.
  12. Thanks, missed that bit. He should have been notified he was on 'standby' in advance (or worked it out as us fans did once all the dropouts started )
  13. 9pm the day before seems ample time to get ready to me, when the meeting wasn't on until the evening - unless he has a full-time regular job which he couldn't get out of?
  14. Even with Musielak out, should still be a Tigers win - Kerr at reserve tips the balance for me.
  15. Lambert uses the premiership again for his Christmas holiday fund
  16. Good riddance I'd say - the meeting at Foxhall showed where his skills are lacking. There also seems to be too much will he won't he ride discussions about him.
  17. Agreed but they could still say who was unavailable, people may understand better - all the Lynn management will know, Phil Morris will know, others at the BSP will know, why can't we?
  18. I know that but did that mean they would've been? As I said, they haven't said who was unavailable.
  19. They haven't said that though have they, just rider unavailability, for all we know it could've been four or five of them missing but as usual there's no honesty. If there was, I could be empathetic.
  20. I'm not slagging anyone off, merely wanting to be informed who was unavailable - surely they can be honest can't they?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy