The SAINT

are you for real ??????????????????? a rider who originally couldn't ride (then we were told he miraculously could) eventually 'falls sick' on the day of the match and (still) couldn't ride .....wonder which country his sick bed is in ???? wonder if he'll be fit for saturday ??? (WE ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWERS) another little stroke pulled and yet sheffield are labelled 'desperate and embarrasing !!!! take a look closer to home ps/ congratulations to peterborough, the best team (on track) on the night,great comeback

wonder which country he's currently laid up in bed in ???? (serious question)

for non FIM events ???

need a date with a free 3 days either side of it to allow for personal their travel arrangements

Surely peterborough wanted to stage it on the 25th...... and that is when they're going to stage it ??????????

totally agree with you here,the riders are blameless and cannot be faulted..... however, their individual commitments are nothing at all to do with british speedway/the fixture list/ sheffield speedway who have run every thursday since 1929)

and why speedway will always be an amatuerish circus and will never join the 'major' sports

basically what you're saying is that any club should plan it's business/fixture list around the travel arrangements of the opposition ???

so basically .....Sheffield wanted to stage the fixture or they'd have had ZERO income for a month while peterborough had 3 riders who wanted an extra 1 or 2 days travelling time (nothing at all to do with this match or british speedway in general) .... make your own minds up as to who is trying to 'pull a fast one' !!!!!!

andre practised at scunny last night so he's definately expecting the call

absolutely not a chance in hell !!

http://www.sheffieldspeedway.co/news.php?extend.1852 all is revealed

steady NOT retiring... from the horses mouth!!!

isn't it the case that they followed the BSPA advice which was miseading ??? or that misleading advice was given by the BSPA ?? either way .. the only 'legal binding' advice is from UKVI

or the last !!!

i was just trying to point out that you don't have to have a 'stoppage' to have an exclusion (in answer to your earlier point)

like a faulty/illegal/missing silencer/dirt-deflector exclusion you mean ????

but it ended garritys' race when he was in front of lawson (even tho it was a pure racing incident and completely unavoidable.. just to emphasise the point)

bellego isn't in the declared 1-7 for this month anyway, so i don't think we will/ can bring him back in till june anyway ?????

ah, now that's where i have to drop out because i can't divulge due to confidences . there are parts of your info that are incorrect though

YEP

where do you get your 'facts' from ?

makes yer blood boil !!! grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr pretty big/earthshattering news in speedway terms - yet the bspa website 'news' section doesn't mention it ............. VERY STRANGE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

absolutely !! garritys race was ended prematurely (pure racing incident) even though he didn't fall exactly the same racing incident saw konopka fall so bates gets excluded ... no consistency

" a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" ..................