Because British speedway needs a supply of talented young riders, and few tracks have the capacity to provide significant track time to youngsters.
A few weeks ago it was a real pleasure to see Ben Trigger riding against Leicester and witness his progress. It's good for the sport
Mm terrible luck to loose Barker and have him replaced by a guy who could only score paid 17
Still a good performance by Glads and sounds like they have good cause to feel aggreived.
Surely Oxford has planning consent. I don't recall it needing a new consent to reopen, so if it closed again it could reopen at a later date (baring a major redesignation in the structure plan?)
YES
Have a look at the 1970s Polish averages. How many meetings did riders like Jancarz and Plech miss because their British contracts required them to be in the UK?
Don't think a dispensation is needed. 12.4 states:
If a rider is representing their FMN in an FIM/FIME Speedway
Championship, irrespective of the rider’s MA, a choice of G or RR facility is
available.
That's the same wording as the rule in the Championship section that allowed a guest for Harris when on long track duty. So my reading is that it is an application of the rules NOT a dispensation.
But he will probably be competing for a spot with Dudek, and if Smektala or Kubera qualify, and that is quite possible, then further places for Poles will be heavily oversubscribed.
I'd give him one, but I don't think I have much influence over that decision.
Industry in California is the only venue I can think of that regularly stages speedway 'indoors'. But it has worked there for many years, so perhaps your suggestion has merit.
You need a minimum of 2 days to allow for team declarations for matches on the first of the month, and a couple of days to catch any errors (there seem to be increasingly more occasions of these of late). But it wouldn't be unreasonable to reduce it to say 5 days.