arnieg

The absurdity is that it doesn't exist in the Championship, the place where if could be of most benefit.

It is very rare for a rider to peak at 19, unless they completely lose interest in the sport. I think it more likely they will continue to mature, adjust to being independent adults seperate of each other and their father and return to an upward trajectory.

Pearson was miles better than Joe tonight (and Dan was pretty underwhelming too). However I would be very wary about reading too much into a single match on a very tricky track.

5 riders in Brum team have ridden for Leicester this season, so they should be no strangers to red and yellow

Saunas?

I'd agree, although there is one Brit with a higher average than Charles in both Prem and Champ - young Scott Nicholls (but guess he'll be commentating)

Aug 6 - 250cc and 125cc support Sept 10 - 500cc & 125cc. Both after NDL matches.

And if he does how could we tell?

Maybe they could just replace Joe with Dan. QUESTION How will they know?

My number one did fine thank you, he scored paid 14.

The problem with this analysis is Morris wasn't eligible to take a rider replacement ride.

As I mentioned in the Oxford programme a couple of weeks ago. 22 March 1975 at Coventry

Indeed, but I wouldn't be in a hurry to condemn him. Riders are self-employed after all.

No you are incorrect. Birmingham did not lose 56-34 last week or against Edinburgh. I note it has been corrected in the media release.

No Nilsson beat Woffinden in heat 7

Did I hear that Dan Ackroyd is the ref

At the moment buying the Berwick v Mildenhall stream seems an enticing alternative.

Interesting. I have had it suggested to me that he was 'high maintennance', looks like this could be true.

"Just 48 hours after a second straight 56-34 home loss .." Can't even get the score right!

Polish Aves for comparison: Dudek 6.72 Tarasenko 6.43 Smektala 6.21 C Holder 5.72 Lidsey 5.47

Yes, but the point is it effectively becomes four unless Worky plan to give Foy a ride.

And the Thompson's might still be riding (and Scott Nicholls could guest for Poole)

I disagree Section 10.2 is headed 'match average' and then deals separately with established and assessed averages. So the only credible statutory construction of the regulations is that Rew has a match average. Therefore 10.3.1 applies and he must be in the top 5.

General concensus last night was that it was the highest of the season so far. But it was still pretty abysmal.

Heat 8 was the other one, but I suppose they cancel each other out.