arnieg

Oxford thru regardless of Tuesday's result

No. The owners are not obliged to run speedway or lease the stadium to anyone who would. They could reinstate the stadium, but more likely is that they will submit a further application for housing possibly after a couple of years of further decay.

In which case they'll sell to the highest bidder - a commercial developer - as happened with Edinburgh's new site

Possibly the least surprising announcement of the week.

Senna Summers was seriously impressive, and thanks for confirming his parentage.

If only Janusz hadn't missed the first round

Easily solved then - just get Kurtz to slowdown

One can't help wondering what kind of pressure was brought about to secure that agreement, after all Redcar strike me as one of the more competently run clubs

Redcar team for 25th: 1 Guest for King 2 Guest for Wright 3 Guest for Riss 4 Guest for Bailey 5 Guest for Hume 6 Jason Edwards 7 Guest for Mulford (presumably Harrison) 28th would be better, but still missing Masters, Edwards and presumably Wright

But the litigant in any case would be a member of the BSPL and would have access to such documents.

In this context pretty obviously yes (along with BSPL AGM minutes)

It's not so much a case of being allowed, more like encouraged by the BSPL while they throw the NDLRC under the bus.

On CLRC 15.8.1 makes it clear that it is top riders by MA . No discretion. For the NDLRC the rules couldn't be more explicit, and I quote verbatim: 15.9 NDL RIDERS CHAMPIONSHIP 015.9.1 Qualifying Criteria To be confirmed I had a bit of a go at BSSPL about this in my programme notes for Oxford v Redcar - in hindsight I think I should have been ruder.

For Hansard substitute BSPL media releases, principally those issued following the AGM.

Not ambiguous? What's long term? 3 days, 3 weeks, 3 months, 3 years? And what is proof? What if you get two conflicting doctors opinions? After all we know that all the existence of a sick note proves, is that someone was able to find a tame doctor to issue one?

If you are a lawyer then presumably you are familiar with Hart v Pepper.

Because the whole point of being a witness is to put a positive spin on the state of British Speedway, so not unreasonably, even if there is only a 30% chance of a new track he's going to talk it up.

No Perry was above Boughen on the qualification date. Despite being announced in early Sept the field was done on 1 August greensheets. Madness I know. It also meant Sam McGurk was annound in original line-up despite having been overtaken by Luke Harrison in the Worky averages

Of course, I forgot it had been moved. [I should have remembered that as my preview of the NDLRC now appears in a Cheetahs prog - today's - instead of a Chargers one]

But wouldn't that ban be the play-off final?

No NDL always gets shat on. Think you are probably right about Prem teams riding on Championship race nights though.

Don't think it being a 're-staging' makes any difference.

That is the rule as I understand it. CL always takes priority except for the NDLRC.

Except the rule is that NDLRC takes priority. I reckon we are about to get an announcement that due to a poor forecast the NDLRC has been postponed

When Henry anc Jordan will be at Workington