arnieg

Any update on the rain?

Lubos Tomicek, Lubos Tomicek and Lubos Tomicek! Adam, Nicky and Guy Allott

You might have difficulties with Buxton then - I've seen a sheep inside the stadium during a match!

Someone's got a persecution complex!

Regardless of the legal point the BSPA should and I believe would veto such a move as not being in the sport's best interest. Do we really want to hear in a week's time that the Plymouth rescue bid has collapsed because three of their riders have been poached by other greedy teams? This is truly an appalling suggestion (unless you think Eastbourne winning is more important than Plymouth surviving).

Joel and Tommy Jansson both reached world finals and would have a good run at third. I'd also programme the Kasper's in this meeting.

Nothing confusing about the rule book, it's what's not in the rule book....

Then why does the rule book include a NEW rule prohibiting TRs in the League Cup?

No the rule book is crystal clear that there are no TR rides in the League Cup, so no that's not wheat has happened.

Not better, but different. All have a legion of problems, some shared, some specific to their division. And in the right circumstances all can provide excellent speedway.

1960 (from completed programme) Larsson rode in heat 1 replacing excluded (tapes or two mins I guess) Bernt Nilsson

I never knew that! Informative, but I wish it weren't true.

halifaxtiger is right. The rule is crystal clear. Furthermore it is the SCB rulebook, so why are BSPA members Godfrey and CVS authorising changes to it - neither are SCB members.

That is indeed what the regulations say. But does that mean a rider who was born in the UK but never gone abroad, and therefore does not have a passport, is ineligible for the NL? Surely not!

People complain about the malign influence of SKY's presence causing matches to go ahead when they shouldn't, and now they remove themselves from that situation and people still complain. This at least allows the Wolves management/SCB official to make appropriate decisions about whether tomorrow's fixture goes ahead. Just can't win!

Here's hoping it does work out. If it does I imagine Plymouth will look to moving into the National League next year. That could make the NL larger than the PL, and the largest speedway league in the world!

The directors can be held personally liable if held to have been knowingly trading whilst insolvent ('wrongful trading' is the corporate jargon). Given the circumstances it is not inconceivable that such a charge could be laid, but highly unlikely.

Sorry but it seems perfectly reasonable to me. You wouldn't expect Accrington Stanley to get the same coverage as Manchester United in the sports pages. I really can't see any evidence that the Star is implementing a policy to 'hold the NL back'. Now you might well question the 'no assets rule' for NL clubs and the BSPAs motives but that bears no relation to the make up of Speedway Star.

The number of league teams peaked at 38 in 1978, after that there was a steady decline until it reached 21 in 1993. Then the formation of BL3 (subsequently Academy, conference and now National league) pushed that up to 27 in 1994. There are currently 28 league teams (if we exclude Plymouth) riding at 27 tracks (Cradley accounting for the difference). The most notable recent trend is the increase in the National League - now with 8 stand alone teams (a record high?). Compare that with 1998 when there were just five teams in the league (four stand-alone: Buxton, Mildenhall, St Austell and Skegness who quickly transferred to King's Lynn; and Newport's junior team).

Are you calling Chris Harris a gater then?

I think you've mislaid Jan Klatovsky from the final standings, 39?

Notwithstanding the cold, the delays and the programme layout howler, what struck me about last night was how upbeat and positive the crowd was. A marked contrast to the grumbling on here over the winter. Still think Rockets are one of the weaker teams, but Stuart Robson illustrated the importance (often under estimated by promoters) of having entertaining riders that the fans can identify with. I'm glad I chose this over Belle Vue!

So a 45 year old working for Goldman Sachs doing a part time MSC merits this a discount even though they are a higher rate taxpayer?

Why?

Part time students can have NUS cards, they could also be working part time earning 50 grand - should they get discounted admission?