But it does seem a logical inconsistency. Seven days out if you are ill, but no days out if a family member is ill.
Are we heading for a rash of riders missing meetings because their mother-in-law is poorly?
Which would be ultra vires and expose the charity to the risk of being struck off, surely payment out of the BSPL bond would be a more logical means of recourse
Mitchell McDiarmid scored 6 on his debut with even less 500cc experience than Cairns just a year ago, and I'd expect Cairns to beat the likes of Chatlas, Szlegiel and Krok.
But looking at Klima's 2024 Polish u24 record it appears that Cluff is the BETTER rider.
I think the word 'sensation' is doing a lot of heavy lifting in the Plymouth press release
And often less than that. For an example:
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09407442/filing-history/MzM1NjU1NDk0OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0
Kapustin is only 18 and part of the Lublin under 24 squad, and Karpov is semi retired. At his peak he was close to SEC standard. Both times I saw him live (once in Poland over 20 years ago and once in DSL fixture) he was pretty much the best rider in the meeting
I would expect 'speedway creditors' to be paid (at least in part) out of the BSPL bond. That then begs the question as to how keen the BSPL to licence the new trading vehicle.
PS I note that in football there are usually large points deductions when a club goes through this type of process to shake off some of its liabilities.
Interesting in that the discussion on Swedish Facebook groups earlier this morning seemed to suggest otherwise. But it's what we normally do in Britain.