I know, just so many rubbish riders in the line up...isn't it ridiculous?
Don't be so pathetic!!
In terms of qualification, I am assuming, and just assuming as we havent actually been told, dont they just take the top 3 riders averages in each team totaled (as of rolling averages on June 1st) and then take the top 10??
This would be the totals as of then, of the top 3 riders according to the BSPA official averages:
Newcastle 24.93
Redcar 24.47
Sheffield 24.04
Workington 23.45
Glasgow 23.38
Plymouth 23.36
Somerset 23.1
Edinburgh 22.8
Leicester 22.72
Rye House 22.71
Newport 22.17
Ipswitch 22.16
Berwick 20.6
Scunthorpe 20
Therefore missing out would be Newport, Ipswitch, Berwick and Scunthorpe.
Then obviously with Plymouth dropping out, I would assume that Newport then would be given the place being 0.01 above Ipswitch, but appears not to be the case.
But I think these figures pretty much lay out the selection of the teams, which seems very fair to me, and I dont see any arguement with it??
Apart from a few anomalies along the way with certain riders who arent in the top 3 taking riders. (Summers for Redcar??)