BackInTheDHSS

Can see Oxford stealing this. No Atkins or Boughen, but Hook is a decent replacement and Scott went well at Edinburgh in the NDL. 43-47

No, there was no practice or set-up session beforehand. Just don't think Scunthorpe are that good, sorry. Oxford vs Poole for the title this year. Becoming a nice little rivarly.

If you thought that was dry and dusty, you're going to have a very long summer...

Peter Schroeck trying his best for Leicester as well by putting Riss out instead of Boughen in heat 12.

Doubt it - as he would have signed for Oxford at the start of the season.

Glad to see you finally admit you’re not a proper Oxford fan. You can go back to Swindon now, we don’t want you.

It's Oxford vs Edinburgh actually.... so has some relevance to Oxford. I'll just gloss over the fact it's actually about the Spires though.

Careful. Toady will argue with you next…

I’ve already addressed your Cook for Kerr narrative. You say that’s not the case, so fair enough, I will respect that. Not sure you’re telling the truth, but I haven’t tried to force it like you are doing with Harris, so stop going on about it. My change at any cost agenda is not quite as extreme as you’re saying, but is also fair in some points. I’ve admitted it and I stick by it, but only if the right riders can come in. I have never said anything different, so what’s your point? Finally, for some reason, you are trying to claim I have a Harris agenda. I don’t, I’ve said so, and have never once claimed to have one - so why are you continuing to go on about it? Have you run out of other Oxford fans to argue with?

I singled out Harris? Haha. You mentioned him and I responded, using Harris as an example. It's not hard to go back and look at previous posts before you spout this agenda nonsense. You're fixated with him!

You must have missed the bit where I said I'd like to keep Chris Harris. It's just before the bit that you put in bold. What a clown! I've no issue with Harris. I'd swap out whoever works with the averages, be that Harris, Wright, Janowski, etc. Oxford should be making the most of the points they have available to improve the team - if there's a rider(s) who want to actually come.

But he's one of the best Italians isn't he? Or should Italy just give up all their spots? There are plenty worse than Paco in the qualifiers. More a question of whether the format of that is right in my opinion. Can't blame him for trying.

Has he said he 'thinks' he should be? Or is he just trying to qualify?

When Craig Cook was in the side, you clearly said you were happy and didn't want any changes. So either, so you didn't care about Lewis Kerr coming back, or you wanted an eight-man team. Which was it?

I don't recall saying Chris Harris should go. Can you show me where I said that please? I said I wanted changes, and still do. Would I like to keep Chris Harris, yes. But would I swap Chris Harris for Robert Lambert, etc., yes. Perhaps this is a topic for the Spires thread, however.

As much as I hate to say it, they are probably the most disliked team due to their success. Not because of the nonsense you’re pointing out.

But I'm certainly not a Poole fan!

Some pretty positive results in the BSN Series perhaps? It was a good start to the season, and I certainly thought Edinburgh had improved. A draw with Glasgow and you're in the semi-finals, which is more than can be said of Oxford.

No...they have 2.

Two riders got injured, but this thread has been turned into a farce. Trackrat exists solely to wind up the Poole fans, and all the Poole fans keep biting. It'll never end.

Oxford have 2.

Possibly didn't understand his agenda, but all very valid points.

Ha ha. He was talking about loyalty in regards to Lewis Kerr, someone you were happy to kick to the curb!

Oxford win, but it won't be a thrashing. 50-40.

What exactly are you looking for? A big pat on the back? Some people great predictions right, and some get them wrong...that's why they are predictions. Nobody can see into the future.