What makes you both think that? On pure 2025 averages (across all meetings) alone, Mitch was higher...
6.18 - Mitchell McDiarmid
5.68 - Fraser Bowes
Do you think Bowes will improve more than McDiarmid in 2026 - at a new home track, whereas Mitch is at the same track as in 2025? I can't it even see it being close in Mitch's favour. Each to their own though.