Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Diamonds85

Members
  • Posts

    1,427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Diamonds85

  1. They're under Kent on the Speedwaygb website, so I'm guessing they'll be known as the Kent Royals again with the same logo as last year...
  2. Glasgow Tigers Avg. Nat. 1 Craig Cook 8.80 GBR 2 Broc Nicol 5.45 USA 3 Tom Brennan 5.88 GBR 4 Benjamin Basso 5.00 DEN 5 Ulrich Ostergaard 7.82 DEN 6 Danyon Hume 4.89 GBR 7 Connor Bailey 4.17 GBR 42.01 -0.01 Can someone help me? I have these as my Glasgow averages. What's wrong?
  3. I have no idea what Lee's average will be and I guess we won't find out until next March probably... I'd be disappointed if we have over 1 point left to play with, as we could've resigned Adam Roynon rather than taking a gamble on George Congreve. Just really hope that gamble pays off
  4. Yawn. What does everyone think the lineup order will be? I would go for personally 1. Bradley Wilson Dean (Outside line rider) 2. Max Clegg (Inside line rider) 3. Paul Starke (Inside line rider) 4. Lee Complin (Outside line rider - or was) 5. Matthew Wethers (Solid as a rock to ride with James and George mainly) 6. George Congreve (Bit of an unknown, but allows James at 7) 7. James Wright (Will soon be in the main body, but for who? VERY strong number 7) Might not be the strongest team out there, but body does it look entertaining...
  5. Would have been nice if they had included the Eastbourne team... Would they just revert back to the averages they achieved at the end of the 2019 season? i.e. what they started 2021 with
  6. I'm not sure who Ken was. But R.I.P. and thank you for all your efforts working with the club.
  7. Last I saw Lee, he'd put A LOT of muscle on... Hope he can recreate his flying around the boards with all that extra weight...
  8. I feel bad even dignifying you with an answer... But things ain't that bad... If Lee can even get back to anywhere near the entertainer he used to be, he'll be a brilliant number 2 or number 4. Him and Max could ride either position then... Yeah, we not the strongest team in the league, but we have a team and for that I am grateful. We have so many entertaining riders, we may not win a lot, but we're never gonna give up 1. Bradley Wilson Dean 2. Lee Complin 3. Matthew Wethers 4. Max Clegg 5. Paul Starke 6. George Congreve 7. James Wright The 2022 Newcastle Diamonds
  9. Seriously though, we not even in the same league as you, so why are you even bothered? I can't wait to watch this team, it's full of racers if nothing else
  10. Wonder if Rob's been quick to announce this signing with the friction on here lately I know he does read the forum...
  11. Who'd have guessed that one!! Always loved watching Lee, brilliant entertainer, one of the best riders I've ever watched at this level of British speedway. Just hope it hasn't been too long for him and he can get plenty of practise in before the season starts. It's a very James Wright sounding signing. I can't wait to watch Lee again Only thing that worries me is that he was never a very good gater!! And Brough is a very specific track to be able to pass on, but he did used to have some big balls... What will his average be?
  12. That's what I was thinking too. But then they riding in 3 leagues technically. So can everyone do that now?
  13. Have to agree with the above... NO THANKS... Ty Proctor and Josh Bates. NO THANKS.
  14. Is a number 8 in the PL allowed to do the CL and NL? That's the question...
  15. What we need to figure out is exactly how many points we have left to play with... I've seen 6.51 mentioned in the past, but does that take into account the Eastbourne fixtures being taken out?
  16. Would be great to see him back on a bike. But I imagine that's long gone now? Would be an interesting number 2. Ellis Perks is another who would be cool to see come back, I know there was whispers of it last year and he would fit...
  17. I would love to see it too... but camt see it. So what other options are there??? Decent ones. I feel we're gonna be 2 or 3 points under the limit again unless there's a name we're missing? Cant think who though...
  18. Just trying to think of names that would fit rather than suggesting names who are clearly 2 or 3 points too high like what normally happens... got any ideas?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy