Marky_Mark

So let’s get rid of heats 2 and 7 as it gives an unfair advantage to teams who built with strong reserves? My point is that it’s up to each team how they build and they will have some heats stronger than others that should even up throughout the meeting.

Ellis

Yes, he’s signed elsewhere

Bomber not at Kings Lynn

No they actually said they only have 2 riders signed on and struggling with the rest of the team, have tried with lots of new overseas riders but they haven’t been meeting the criteria for a visa. Of course that can change and I hope it does and that Plymouth put out a competitive team, it’s a great little club with good supporters and it’s not been nice seeing them struggle to find heat leaders in recent seasons. All I was doing was sharing what I’d been told, no different to every other thread on here where people are sharing who’s signed for which team. If you disagree or think different then no problem and we’ll wait and see what side they declare.

Alfie

Correct 👍

From the horses mouth they’ve only got 2 signed on

Plymouth struggling for riders again

Not Brennan

Even if that is the case then surely let speedway run whilst the stadium is still operating? Stocks still run there so I honestly can’t see what the issue is, must be more to it that people don’t want to say publically?

I thought teams weren’t allowed to do this anymore (run their team at another track). I’m sure there were plenty that had to stop running when this was introduced, Cradley, Weymouth etc

Why is there no chance of speedway whilst the Dugard’s own Arlington exactly? I thought that the previous situation was to do with the level that was proposing to be run at, and they didn’t want to lease the stadium to a national league team?

Any update?

Looks like sadly it did spread to the stadium and has done significant damage https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn38d5yrlk0o