GS550

You could write an encyclopedia on it

Shoe on the other foot more like. Gazc actually made a light hearted good humoured post and you come back with that sh*te jeez.

I think SarpenRake was joking mate

For the sake of your club I sincerely hope so. It didn't work that way for Glasgow at Workington. Nor for "Edinburgh" in their one season at Shawfield (yes I know they called it "Scottish Monarchs" but neither the ex-Tigers faithful nor enough of the Edinburgh faithful took to it in sufficient numbers). Though this Lakeside at Rye venture does look more viable and fingers crossed that it works out that way. Best of luck.

That's a surprise

So long as they keep it behind closed doors

Oh dear. Isn't sexism illegal

Blobby you seem to know a lot about grapes recently, are you sure they aren't yours

Correct!! On both counts. Edinburgh is further West than both Carlisle and Liverpool.

Well I guess nobody is expecting this one.... Today's supplementary question, which is further west, Edinburgh or Liverpool. And no it isn't a trick question

No doubt! I guess Wellmeadow Café in Paisley closed a long time ago.

Er, Google "Wikipedia Mrs Donoghue snail in bottle Paisley". Its like something out of "Ripley's Believe It Or Not". Incredible thing. The principle was even adopted south of the border.

Its also where a certain Mrs Donoghue once drank a decomposed snail from a bottle of ginger beer in a Paisley café. A landmark event felt well beyond the realms of Paisley. Sorry I digress. Back on topic the repercussions were probably felt in all of England including Lakeside (apologies I've been on the sauce again)

Sorry I wasn't following the bleedin script

Afaik don't think snapper is referring to Taylorj

You might not believe this, ok you will, the Armadale track always looks terrible from where I'm standing. Although usually you don't actually see the track at Armadale, only the fence and the helmets moving.

Is it?

Lighten up mate

Cos you now have a couple of Glasgow riders??

Er, because its so tiny?? The riders always appear to come to a standstill on the apex of the bends, its a slow track so if the riders were going at any real speed the track times would be about 20 seconds cos its such a tiny tiny track, not really "speed"way is it

Trick track?

Thanks. I know its a saying but I would point out there was no 'war', as I already said my sole concern was for the injured rider and it doesn't matter to me what team they ride for be it Berwick, Ipswich, Lakeside, anybody, I don't like to see crashes or riders injured and that was my sole concern.

False. I merely asked a question, nothing else. The only way to ask was to give the context why I was asking. Why be so negative? There was not one shred of negativity on my part, why must people be so determined to be so negative. In fact I tried to assist you by seeing the context and recognising that it didn't look great and I gave you the opportunity to clarify. As I've said, the only person that could answer the question was yourself. Likewise the only person that can answer your false accusation is me and I can tell you one hundred percent that I did not do as you have falsely accused me of, I only asked a question, if you are determined to make something of it that it simply never was then that is your problem. The fact remains that I only asked a question. Human beings are intelligent beings but they all too often take something that simply isn't there as you have done. You were the only person that could answer the question I asked and I am the only person that can answer your false accusation and you should similarly accept that there was no intent whatsoever and I am deeply offended by your false accusation., you are wrong sir, your assumption is misplaced and factually incorrect. I also edited the original post so as to reflect your clarification as that was the decent thing to do. I am deeply offended by your false accusation. You should also have the decency to accept my clarification.

Well, the only person that could answer the question was yourself and you have now answered no - that was all I expected to begin with. You now also appear to get why I asked, as you say it was "unfortunate" that your particular post immediately followed a couple of other posts and to be honest it didn't look great, hence why I put the context of the posts it followed and asked you a perfectly legitimate question. On a positive footing It gave you the opportunity to answer and clarify. All fair enough. Thanks.

False. I simply asked a question, nothing more nothing less. It was a civil question deserving only of a civil answer nothing more.