-
Posts
1,167 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Everything posted by 1 valve
-
Ok, but taking you thinking to the point of implementation means riders could be forced by a promoter or organising body to ride in any meeting they wish them to appear in, irrelevant of the riders own wishes. Such exploitative practices where individuals are forced to work against their will are the crux of modern day slavery which is prevented by suitable and agreed contracts of work/employment/engagement being put in place.
-
The line up for the meeting is indicative of the current state of British speedway. in days gone by there were two semi finals feeding through to a top quality line up for the final. Now we have only one semi final made up of Premiership reserves & championship second strings which reflects poorly on the so called development of British talent. Sad to see!
-
The possibility of a section 215 being issued would put the onus on Brandon Estates to clear the site or at the very least be used as a bargaining tool to keep the price of acquiring the derelict land at a reasonable level
-
I don't think many (if any) folk would disagree with you on that point.
-
By restrictions, rather than physical barriers such as land borders or existing buildings, the new stadium had a limited amount of land allocated for it to be built which was fully utilised. In case you were not already aware, the land fans walk past on their way to the stadium from the car park was not available for speedway having been earmarked for the development of football & BMX facilities. Which have not come to fruition.
-
Not actually true. There was a restriction to the total space allocated for the speedway stadium to be built which impacted the area available for the actual track. That said, whilst there was absolutely no chance a circuit the size of the NSS could have been accommodated, the original straights were built too long for the accompanying bends and hence the well deserved negative comments aimed at the track from the outset. However, since then a great deal of work has been carried out over time to modify the inside length of the track giving more room for entry into and exit from the turns together with banking more than one racing line and yes. passing opportunities From what has been recently stated, work continues on improving the banking which can only be a positive point and a great deal of effort from many folk over the years has for a very large part finally addressed the original (mistake) design.
-
What a very strange & insensitive comment. Clearly, as stated, the family have decided to let Tai decide when & what details are released regarding the injuries and treatments he has had to endure. In the meantime, his wife & mum have taken the opportunity to sincerely offer heartfelt thanks & recognition to the folk who in the immediate aftermath of the incident made all the right calls to save Tai from an outcome far more final than from what you think are newsworthy injuries. Those of us who share concern over the health of one of speedways greatest riders have been please to read the message and will continue to abide by the request not to speculate any further in preference to waiting for further official updates to be released at a time whenTai and his family decide is appropriate.
- 103 replies
-
- 20
-
-
Ryan Douglas Testimonial
1 valve replied to Barrow Boy 2's topic in Speedway Testimonials & Individual and Shared Events
No. not even even with covers. Simply because the track was perfectly dry as the introduction of the riders was commencing , but then the heavens opened with continuous heavy rain for 90 minutes - such conditions making it simply impossible for any outdoor/permanent speedway track to be raced on. great shame for Dougy & the assembled fans as a fantastic line up went to waste - for now -
Sorry. I should have said "the lack of sufficient admission facilities" Four being insufficient hence the 30 minute delay of the start to get folk in. However, credit where credit is due. Four is far more sufficient than the two at Leicester. And to close - it was great that NKI got such a great and well deserved turnout for his testimonial.
-
Ok, so my journey time was quicker than expected, Yes, I got a program, Yes, I got to stand where I wanted too Yes I appreciate it was a good day for NKI. No, I did not appreciate the 30 minute delay to the start of the meeting due folk turning up late No I did not appreciate the lack of admission facilities which caused the long queues. The point promoters should recognise and act on, is that customers (sporting event or supermarket) do not like unreasonable length of queues to get in or pay for the prodct...Example, last week, went to premier league football match circa 50,000 attendance. Arrived at stadium gate 30 minutes prior to kick off, qued for less than five minutes to gain admission using pre purchased ticket, had a beer, a pie, took my seat 5 minutes before kick off...and guess what, the match started on time!. Surely, speedway can have some willingness to provide a quality product, start to finish instead of relying on the willingness of supporters to accept a poor offering. Which judging by the fall off in spectators over the past decade is the outcome of poor promotion is fast coming home to roost.
-
Ryan Douglas Testimonial
1 valve replied to Barrow Boy 2's topic in Speedway Testimonials & Individual and Shared Events
Quote from todays NKI benefit meeting. “First meeting of the season, and the start time is pushed back 30 mins. Regrettably, a good chance this will also be the case at Ryan’s meeting unless something is done proactively to provide more capacity for sale of tickets. Be mindful the 30 minute delay today meant that those who turned up early had a wait of two hours before the start of the meeting - almost longer than the actual meeting. Totally unacceptable! -
Ryan Douglas Testimonial
1 valve replied to Barrow Boy 2's topic in Speedway Testimonials & Individual and Shared Events
Is this meeting being streamed live for UK audience? -
Ok fair enough - albeit any extra cost could have been added on as a "booking fee" at least then folk would have a choice. For the sake of those who will be going I hope "the organisers" arrange for adequate capacity for the sale of admission tickets. FYI this means that as season ticket holders and those who normally buy online will need to join the queue to pay on the day then the normal TWO sales windows should not be regarded as adequate. And as further advice to the organisers, please understand that inadequate capacity to sell tickets on the day will not only mean long queues forming to gain admission, but will also create a delay to the start of the meeting due to folk still waiting to get in...meaning those who did arrive early will need to hang around even longer before the meeting gets under way.....
-
Very true. Unfortunately Leicester’s two ticket outlets at the stadium are woefully inadequate to deal with a large attendance where everybody has to queue for tickets due to lack of advance ticket sales. Unless ticketing arrangements are changed to include advance sales then I know of at least six folk who will not be going. come on Lions, get real with this issue,
-
I understood the judgment all but put paid to any concept of a housing development on the site being possible. However, developing a commercial site of industrial units and of offices may be seen in a different light by planners given the concept would be to provide places of work rather than places to live. Thus giving Brandon Estates a way forward. similarly any parties interested in bringing motor sports back to Brandon could consider an approach similar to that being proposed at Swindon. (Albeit doubts exist about the genuine intentions of the the folk involved there). Would it be worth exploring with Brandon Estates the possibility of a joint venture to bring both a commercial development and a stadium to the site?
-
Being mindful of the current proposal regarding a possible new speedway site for Swindon. Did the outcome of the planning refusal/appeal judgment relating to Brandon actually also rule out development of commercial property such as small industrial units and offices on the site?
-
Well, it could be an argument, as most development in the Green Belt is prohibited, with some exceptions for agriculture and leisure. However, a former landfill site cannot be classed as Green Belt- even if it is currently a "green field".