My thoughts exactly, but Lahti only did what others had already done.
And actually I think Lahti has ridden in both individual finals the same year... FI and SE.
From what I’ve witnessed, the jury goes the results through from several papers heat by heat. How come was there a mistake? Not watching that crap meeting again, but easily checked anyway.
Because Pavel Ondrasik and Giuseppe Grandi say so. They are the ones that have signed the results after probably 30 minutes of going through them in The jury room...
Writing results isnt always easy, but this one was.
Longtrack needs taking over. Not really sure what anyone could do with it, but it’s not getting better if CCP is the promoter of it for 20 days a year.
Like I've stated in this thread, the person in question was an interesting character, said he was the first and Eastbourne was mentioned. His other stories have checked out ok, so we have actually no reason to suspect he's lying on this one.
Maybe because these ex riders weren't man enough at the time lodging OFFICIAL protests and making checks happen. Instead they whine here now for how many years later... Maybe they had something of their own to hide at the time?
So I was only wrong on person/organisation to blame. In real life though, I've wanted to create the perfect excel sheet myself (cos it would be free) for almost 20 years now. Cant do it, so haven't released A SINGLE draft for public use. Maybe something for the bigger companies to live by...