Roger Jacobs

Douglas, Tungate, Lidsey ... ?

It appears that the #8, now known officially as the "Additional Rider" cannot be used as a reserve. "011.4.3 AdditionalRider(AR) An AR can only be utilised if a team is operating RR. An AR is not a 3rd reserve. " Corrected my error from earlier, which quoted the NDL version of the Reg! However: "011.4.4 Rider Replacement (RR) Facility allows the absent rider’s programmed rides to be shared out between other team members (including any Guest riders), subject to: <snip> f) A rider nominated as an AR may, at the Team Managers discretion, take any ride at any time in heats 1-14, (apart from the protected riders position in heats 2 and 8 in the Premiership League). Whilst the minimum ride rule does not apply, the maximum number of rides is 7. The AR is not permitted to cover starting offences." All of that wording is very confusing! (the bit in bold is as printed in the Regs)

It's punishment enough for any team that a Rising Star has to move into the top 5 if their average means it's possible - they should stay at reserve all season, as do the youngsters in Poland. Anyway, Ipswich have got an RS, it's Dan Thompson - he is still in the declared 1-7 and is named in the team to face Birmingham, but with R/R to cover his unfortunate absence. The other problem with the Regulations is that they "only" allow R/R or another RS for a rider who is clearly riding well - better than any current RS, and - using your yardstick - better than an ExtraLiga rider.

Visa problems - they thought they could bring him in on an "Invitational Visa" ... but, for undisclosed reasons, it's not possible.

As confirmed by Witches1998, Doyle's replacement only has to have a lower average - they must not exceed 41.00. Ref: SCB Reg 011.2 TEAM COMPOSITION.

Doyle has got a 9.36 average - why would wiggle room be needed?

The 8 day rule applies to consecutive meetings at the same track, so Nicholls can't ride at Foxhall on Thursday.

Although, of course, Lawson conceded the match changing 1-5 in Heat 8 against Thompson & Jenkins ...

Hilarious headline on the Leicester Facebook page:

I think Bagpuss meant that facilities to replace riders are available is not a valid reason to stage the meeting - just another BSPL excuse.

Corrected

KOC-Up, unless Leicester win on aggregate on Thursday night, then it's another Prem match!

It says Lovey … Arch has sussed me out, even though I have no idea who s/he is. At least I keep up with the news from Aus ;-)

No - he was riding in Aus in the winter and damaged a shoulder. I’m sure I read that he also had an operation in a shoulder last year …

Ellis dislocated a shoulder riding in Aus ...

http://www.sheffield-speedway.com/news.php?extend.3506

Postponement ...

Doyle's withdrawal doesn't count?

Brum unpredictable. Klindt a decent guest for King, and the Witches are working well as a team - even so, will need one of the reserves to click. Could be close - either way.

#8 would be a non-contracted NDL rider, so unlikely to be competitive.

Another person using the Mail/Express version of whatever they think “woke” means. It’s right-wingers who curb free speech -that’s why Mail and Express readers cheerfully try to blame everyone else.

Surely he will be "Throwing the track out with the rain water" ... I'll get me rain coat and pit gate repair set.

The SCB Statements are often worded poorly - they need someone to proofread.

Nope. Karl told me via Messenger: "Facebook has disabled the group because it has removed post that violate rules. I have files an appeal and am awaiting feedback."

J.Holder, C.Holder and Woffinden were only beaten by Doyle & Sayfutdinov - defeating all the other Witches - although they did defeat Doyle and Sayfutdinov in some heats - so it was really honours-even between the top riders. In the meantime, Doyle & Sayfutdinov scored only 8 each, and were beaten by Sheffield second string riders in one race each when they scored 0.