I'm pretty sure that a side of young hopefuls would pull more in than some of the riders they've had recently, crowds are down because people have no hope. If the consortium is exactly as you say (I only knew Brian and it was in his grass tracking days)then the Bears are nothing more than a circus act. It seems pointless carrying on if you aren't prepared to compete.
I know that but it would be nice to have a challenging side, rather than cast-off's. It's very doubtful that they'd get him anyway, unless a third party was prepared to bankroll him, Havelock certainly wouldn't spend more than the bare minimum on riders, even if he had it.
You have to want it and he doesn't seem to want it enough. If he has the urge to come back within a year, he could just have his head in gear and actually be a better rider.
Last year you called me a troll and a hater for saying Glasgow had a rubbish team (they had!), this year they look better already, whoever the last two are. Too early to say that it's a championship challenging side but it's definitely better.
I think if you accept the draft you have to abide by the draw.
The principle of the thing is to give riders with potential more chances and experiences. What you describe will create opportunities for trickery, eg 'you stop at home sonny and we'll get X rider in for the day,' I know there has already been abuse of that kind but this seems to make it even more likely.
Carl Wilkinson FFS! They might as well pick Boocock, Boothroyd and Younghusband.
On the other hand, if you enter the draft you are declaring your availability.
If you listen to the link I posted, it does say that riders such as Lawson and Richie Worrall will be on much higher rates than draft riders and any draft rider offered a place in a main body, is free to take it.
Others move up! The list won't exist until they have all accepted, they don't go on it until they have been asked.
http://www.speedway365.com/archives/11851