
oldace
Members-
Posts
1,999 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by oldace
-
But you are a wally even now never mind at 22. In the real world a glass or two of wine or a couple of beers would not have been an issue but to stlll be in his system by midday darcy will have had a sight more than that and/ or been still drinking into the early hours. I doubt his career can be saved from here, for sure a ban will result
-
Wards biggest problem throughout his british career has been Middlo. He was a young impressionable lad in a strange country who was in desperate need of a father figure type to keep him on the right track. Sadly Middlo seemed to want to be his friend rather than manager and with no one to rein him in Ward went off the rails. I know its a strange thing to say about a 50 something bloke but Middlo strikes you as rather childish and immature and certainly not someone fit to guide a young career
-
And the Jonasson bit is pronounced Joe Hansen when Ermolenko pronounces it
-
Rolling At The Starts - Growing Problem?
oldace replied to SPEEDY69's topic in Speedway News and Discussions
You might as well say if a rider uses a 550 cc motor and gets away with it good luck to him, or takes banned substances etc. The idea is for a reflex action start, nothing else. The rider should be still and not move until the tapes are released, anything else is cheating. In Athletics there are not even allowed to go exactly on the gun. If they go within (I think it is) 1/10 of a second of the gun it is a false start because the human brain cant react that fast. The only time a ref should leave the race to run is if the offender ends up at the back, otherwise bring it back -
No, just the status of someone sick to death of a soppy old duffer cluttering up the forum with inane crap, making posts and later deleting them after they have been responded to making threads hard to navigate, constantly playing the "woe is me card" when anything on the forum isn't to his liking. And that's just your good points
-
My advice was for you to quit the forum altogether
-
On the face of it, no it shouldn't be allowed but without the full facts its hard to judge. Have they, like Mildenhall, pushed the boundaries of "reasonable expectation" to the point where a complaint is legitimate, Have a look around at other motor sport venues and you will see that, even though they were there long before any houses, the restrictions on how many days a year they can operate and the hours they can operate are very stringent. Noise nuisance isnt treated lightly (nor should it be) and the owners of mildenhall must have known they were on dangerous ground with their 3am operations The time for you to quit the bsf was long ago but you insist on continuing to make a fool of yourself on here day in day out. Do us all a favour and make your fond farwell permanent
-
Indeed so but I guess "reasonable use" came into play. 3AM is not reasonable to expect a motor sport stadium to be operational
-
Obviously speedway never took place at 3AM. The point was that there were regular stockcar movements going on till midnight (and they are noisy beasts) and, by the admission of Halifaxtiger, track maintenance on occassion went on until 3AM to get the track ready for the following days speedway.
-
Possibly the airbase are a little more respectful of the environment in which they operate. They probably dont manouvre aircraft at 3am
-
And whether you had one or not, guarantee it goes on the insurance claim. I bet there have been more claims for Rolex watches than watches made by Rolex
-
But where does all leave me? Am i super intelligent or a bit of a d!ck.
-
I don't treat you different on the grounds of race, I treat you different because your'e stupid !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Ah but you are a much superior intellect than Ian, he is from Sunderland when all is said and done
-
He was merely putting in print the point I was sarcastically already making. Like I said I better work on my sarcasm
-
I will work on it !!!!!!!!
-
But that wasn't the point being made. This latest incarnation of KKS was in some way trying to imply that a poor meeting at Kings Lynn must mean Leicester is not a bad track.
-
Perhaps my sarcasm went over both your heads !!!!!!!!!!
-
Have you noticed any difference when normal people quote a post and add their own contribution and when you attempt the same. I don't mean the fact that your posts are nonsense, there is another subtle difference. Think outside the box on this one
-
FIM regs, if I recall, are partly the reason Belle Vue is not a very good track. To get it to the minimum size the track was much longer than it really should have been in relation to the bends. As Hyde Road was FIM accredited PC was keen to ensure Kirky Lane was also to the detriment of having a real good race track. As you say a ridiculous OP, the guy is either drunk or he has got sh!t for brains, I suspect the latter
-
I haven't won any Michelin stars either but I can still tell when a meal tastes like sh!t
- 54 replies
-
- 22
-
-
And your point? FIM accredited or not Leicester is a truly dreadful race track. It has straights far too long for the tightness of the bends.
-
Go on John, you are dying to impress us all with your perception of the use of the word "finals" are you not You want to point out that the event at Kings Lynn is not the final itself. To be honest I think the terminology is correct. Events 1 and 2 together with the race off and Final form part of the World Cup week and can be correctly termed as having made the finals
-
Jeez there are some wallies on here. FFS it was just a joke, the track isn't compromised, they are not lifting the corners, they can even fit more than 4 bikes on the straight at once