oldace

[

In terms of mph there is not a lot of difference between 2015 and 1975 so what do you base your conviction that bikes are the problem on. I am not saying you are right or wrong but wonder what you think is the probkem

Starman, Sidney and the drop a cog wally. Jesus you couldn't find three dumber characters if you tried and we get them all for free on here.,

But again you are talking degrees of being drunk. After only 1 drink you are by and large in control of your faculties but even after that control is diminished, albeit only ever so slightly but diminished all the same. Why do you think some jobs have a zero limit. 1 pint would probably not affect your driving ability but it would hinder you if you had to land a Boeing 747.

It is everyone's right to be stupid but you are abusing that right. What is it that you can't understand. By nature alcohol impairs your senses (I exclude you from that for obvious reasons). That state is popularly called being drunk. Now to what degree you are drunk depends on the amount consumed. 1 pint = not very drunk, 10 pints equal very drunk. No alcohol = sober. You can't have alcohol in your system, not even a small amount and be sober Are you with me so far. So at the time of the test in Riga Darcy had alcohol in his system. It matters not, for the purpose of this debate, how much alcohol, just that some was present.

No he is making you look stupid, to be fair though you have given him lots of help

To be drunk is to be in a state where alchohol impairs your decision making and thinking process. There are of course degrees of being drunk but falling over puking up isn't the only definition. Even 1 pint affects these processes to a very small degree, not enough that you would be considered unfit to drive but affected all the same. So yes. After 1 pint you are, in a tiny way drunk, after 15 pints you will be very drunk with different degrees for each pint in between. When you start talking sh!t that can be a sign you are either very drunk or Starman

Well I must have missed the other 2%

Sidney is an odd one. He puts his point of view over then throws a hissy fit when someone dares to question it. He has the same stock responses to each poster as well. He gets more abusive with each post until finally earning a ban for it. Shame really because on occasion he can be quite informative

Clearly the 70% is a guesstimate but I imagine Sidney isn't a million miles out. The Poole faithful do seem in the main rather supportive of Darcy and everything he does

Sidney, the gift that just keeps giving.

No you are thinking of James Last, he was no relative of James Wright, but he did often finish last so maybe there was a distant link on his mothers side Anyway back to Darcy Ward

Yes quite a close relative, but no relation to Steve Davis, who was no relation to Joe Davis who made mint balls I believe,

But that situation really did once happen in speedway, not with police officers I grant you. Oxford needed a guest for the absent John Davies, he was absent because he had joined Reading, and on this occasion the guest chosen was John Davies, must be the only time a rider has guested for himself.

Now come on, if you were involved in an accident what would give you most reassurance. A fully trained paramedic arriving at the scene or a pissed up Darcy staggering up, beer bottle in one hand, fag in the other? Darcy for me everytime Joking aside exactly as you say, no one other than the paramedics should be allowed anywhere near the injured rider. In the case of a rider who doesn't speak English then, if available, someone who can communicate between the two could be allowed but definately not any Tom Dick or Harry from the pits (should Ward have even been in the pits anyway?)

I always ended up with chewing gum or toothbrushes. Didn't get much action but had lovely smelling breath

How did you go on in the seventies when Durex sponsored a few meetings, did you have a draw full of the things

A bit of info here http://www.ipswichtransportmuseum.co.uk/sim50mc.htm

Were they not a supplier of formal evening garments worn by members of the freemasons back in the 80s. They were from Glasgow if I remember rightly

Just what the forum was short of, another self appointed police officer telling us all what we can and cant ask. Maybe John Leslie can send future posts to you to proof read before posting and you can then give your approval, or otherwise Incidentally this forum has a built in system to tell you if your posts are half witted or not and all three of these have fallen foul of it

Ok we will rule him out then in light of this new evidence, which wally suggested him in the first place

Its all we have to go on at this stage though. Ron Mason is in the frame here, get him pulled in for a little chat Its like the sweeney this aint it

Ok John no problem, i will hold off with my enquiries until we get a further lead from daveallen81 All this could have been avoided if the op made it clear who he was referring to couldnt it

Assumption is the mother of all cock ups. I will continue my investigation till we get a firm id Is he/she wearing glasses?

[quote name="gustix" post="2588063" timestamp="1427017938 I now understand the rider's name to be Mason Wear - I originally thought that was the name of a sponsor company! How do you do it Holmes, excellent deducing there. I had it down to five suspects who the mystery riders id was but you beat me to it