orion

Why is it harsh ? even the BSPA can't have a serial drug offended to run a speedway club

Yea looks like he trying to safe his own skin , he told his lawyer that he was taking drugs now this week he's says he's not been taking them for ages ..thats why I never feel sorry for as over years he gets caught only to say he's stopping only to be caught out again .

Was there no heat 13 in the old days then ? you may prefer the old tac rule but the point you were trying to make that somehow it was fairer when of course when you look at the facts it is not the case Fisher would have got two points the fact remains it's still away win old rules or new rules

First of all the guy who work out it was a draw had all the facts wrong so in fact it was a Away win still ...it's quite clear why they piddle about with the old system as it cost to much to pay riders who were on high pay who were replaceing low paid riders . Thou in the World cup we have seen riders let others go past so there team can use a joker I can't remember that happening in The El, first of all the riders would be losing points money and even it has happened I sure there was plenty of times under the old rules when teams fell 6 points behind on purpose so they could used a tac sub or sometimes a double tac sub .

Where of course it was worth using the old tac sub in every race lol ..

To fair in the old days iv'e him scored 0 and1 many a time at Swindon he used to hate the place thou he's been better in recent times ,

loss as 5 -3 still gives Boro the win thou what that has got to do with new rule being unfair to the old rule god only knows ... now as I asked you 3 times how many extra points could you score under the new rule and how many under the old rule ? why is it takeing you so long to come up with the answer ? Try to understand on one is saying the new rule is good or fair but to said your thought the old rule was fair is stupid ...how many matches do you think the old tac sub changed ?

?? what are you on about now ? if the old rule was in place they never have 12 points down as KB would have been used as a ts before and they would be much closer and Batch would still had a ef and Swindon would have still got beat ..I hate say this but I have respect for the White Knight on this subject as at least he understands than any kind of tac subs are wrong not that the old rule was not fairer.. I can understand that point of view

What has going to meetings in the early seventies got to with anything ? you don't like the new rule as you said it can make the score closer so I ask you again what is the most extra points you can score under the new rule and what was the most you could score under the old rule seeing your such a expert on old speedway it won't take you long to come up with the answer ..

Tell me what the most extra points you can score from two extra rides you can score now ? then tell me how many tac subs you could used in the old days and times that by 3 and tell me what that adds up to ? .also using tac subs you could pick and choose what heats you could put your riders in unlike now where you don't get a a choice .As for your last point yet again you have defeated yourself again as if the old rule was still in place now how could it be fairer as you would still not be up against a top class number one or a heat leader would you ?

indeed you never that what makes people moaning about the rule all the more stupid now ...Please don't tell me you thought the old rule was fairer ? Are the saying the old rule never gave a team to come back if they were in football terms 2 nil down or that the rules were not in place to make the scores closer ? Tell me in that Match you saw did reading used tac subs ? Can't wait to see how you explain that ? Tac subs had more chance of making the worst side win than the new rule ever had ...you won't being able to argue because you can't because as no logic will in a million years can make the old rule fairer .

Spot on ..tells us he won't go to speedway because of the double points but was more than happy to go when the old tac rule was in place what is more unfair and stupid than the double points ever was .

What about if football got away goals to count for double if the scores were level ... nah that would never happen

Think you could be in for a shock

Bang on the money ..trouble we got is that most of the Swindon think they are going to get a new stadium when in fact it's likely to be the end of the road . Are rather stay as we are .

Thank God Wolves never got the Dane Eastie got otherwise title over ...chance missed .

In the report it said that Lee also had pills ..how did his mate grow them ?

So nothing to do with this case then ? so as I said he buys his drugs off Dealers .

Reading the report again I can't see the bit where it said he was growing his own ? also it said he had pills. Did he grow them as well ?

Why ? where do you think he's buying his drugs from ? Boots ?

With Lee's record looks like he has been addicted for life ...by the way where do you think he gets his drugs from ? the bottom line is that the money he makes from Speedway is given to drug dealers who inturn used that cash to supply harder drugs to kids etc ....not just about some guy having a smoke and takeing a couple of pills .

I thought Barker was involved ?

Why not ? surely it's best to see what the stadium plans are first ...Finlay sounded very happy that Football is coming, that suggests that The Stadium might be for Dogs and Speedway as well also Horton said tonight that Speedway will run for the next 10 years hadly the words of people who think they going to get kicked out .

Maybe page 3 ? after all Cook and Barker are a pair of ** (surely that is not a rude word )

Not sure about that, have a feeling by the way Horton and Findlay were talking that if there is a stadium it might be multi purpose as they seem quite relaxed and happy that football was coming .