Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
  • Posts

    18,276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Everything posted by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  1. Only by those named in the original squad I believe (and if they can get there) Bewley will surely replace Tai
  2. I reckon EVERY fan of EVERY team is saying the same!! Great name too
  3. Perhaps more accurate had Haza have said the purchase stopped the top flight from closing rather than Peterborough......??
  4. Or Delia Smith with her blue and white rosette before the FA Cup final all those years ago
  5. Well deserved title for the Panthers - by far the most consistent side all season and certainly the most determined at the crunch times when the small margins make the difference between winning and losing
  6. I hope he didn't fall and bang his head again when they did that.......
  7. Unfortunately I still don't have much enthusiasm for a more serious contribution to the debate at this time which is disappointing Hopefully there will be something over the winter that reinvigorates my interest
  8. The biggest error is between your ears...... Grow up or shut up!!
  9. Sheffield have made a valiant attempt to be the team replacing Poole as the one that tests hiw flexible the regulations are.....
  10. I may be wrong but I think it may have something to do with no longer having the bikes drop oil and clay can be used to help bind the surface
  11. Sad news indeed although not totally unexpected having read the extent of his issues following the recent crash Probably underrated by many due to the depth of talent during his time RIP Alan - thoughts with family and friends
  12. RIP Colin I had the pleasure of a mini pit tour at the British GP conducted by Colin. Despite obviously having a long list of duties on the day you would've thought I was his only responsibility at that time
  13. Mustve been the reason for heat 14 - exhausted and just couldn't hold on anymore plus no energy left to get up.......
  14. Page 113 of the regs There is no longer reference to irr not being available when rr is in use so it has indeed been changed
  15. The regs must therefore have been altered as previously it was clearly stated that IRR could not be used when RR was already in operation Arguably a sensible change (see there are some!) but would interesting if someone is able to copy paste the extract from the regs to clarify if/when it happened
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy