dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

100% agree.Just not quite the fluffy amicable agreement that many hailed it as.

so really Lakeside havent given Rye much choice.Effectively they have said if you put the transfer through before the season starts and claim priority over Kennett we will sack him!

Will the rearranged date cause any issues for Ryes Swedes?

Impressive result for the Rockets. Should walk the group from here. Looks like Busk could be the signing of the season

is that rhyming slang??? wink

If Rye can win by enough to deny Somerset a point they will have the group in their pocket already IMO.

very smug! wink

Anyone concerned about the money would watch the footy on tv rather than pay to go.

all that effort and no bites Shads! wink

Stopped at Foxhall Road. Still grey and cold but hopefully no more wet stuff due!

How does the old ryhme go? Rain rain go away come again...... .....on a Kings Lynn raceday or something like that! wink

Best wishes to Kenneth.

average 49.5 - 42.5 so better than the majority of teams visits to Foxhall

good call - agree that is important if we are to qualify for the semis.

As Shads mentioned the weather forecast is poor so fingers crossed for a favourable window to get it on. I think the Rockets could be dark horses this year and are capable of providing strong resistance at tracks like Foxhall. A 6 point win would do for me in this one.

none taken. I think its gonna be a really good year in the PL - very even - dont see any runaways or also rans.

I like to think not hence the hopefully and the wink in the post. And if you cant be positive about your teams chances at the start of a season its gonna be a long miserable year! Gazc -By Moanarchs standards I rate my smugness about a D (must try harder!)

obviously jenga has also heard about the new fish at Rye!

They did close the loophole. The reversion reg was removed from this years published document.

I believe the regs altered last year to eliminate protests about line ups on the day of a meeting. All challenges have to come in the proceeding days.Once the meeting starts the teams having been ratified cannot be challenged by protest.

So there are a few possiblescenarios 1- Babs put on the lights and awarded a 5-1 as per per positions at the fall but changed/was persuaded to change he mind 2 heats later. 2 - Babs didnt put on the lights but felt riders were impeded and so awarded at time of fall but changed/was persuaded to change 2 heats later. 3 - Babs didnt put the lights on and let the race finish as there was no impediment but failed to be able to tell the difference between riders from opposite teams and called the wrong result. She then changed/was persuaded to change 2 heats later. Whichever it doesnt look good on her. I dont buy the communication issue. Surely she has to ratify the official programme entry before continuing with the meeting. Again if this has not been correctly followed it doesnt look good on her.

Last nights meeting did follow a familiar pattern for our away trips. Generally in the mix but have a run of 3-4 heats where we implode and give ourselves a mountain to climb. Take 4,5,6 (14-3) out of the equation last night and its a comfotable win. Sorting this out could be the key to any success.

so presumably the red lights didnt come on?If so the right decision seems to have been made - in the end. As Wembleylion stated though I thought a race result couldnt be amended after it has been officially announced.

Some you win some you lose. Early days and there are more important matches than this (hopefully!) at the other end of the season. Well done to the Rockets - enjoy it while you can - wink!

glad to hear it - no man should have to make do with a shriveled sausage!