dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Wells and Howarth the only 2 Comets that looked remotely interested. Good solid Witches performance. Excellent guest performance from Richie. Both reserves looked to be set up very differently in the second half of the match - much more poke off the bends. Hard on Gino to be excluded - looked to me he laid it down to avoid an out of control Howarth. At very least both shouldve gone if ref considered them separate incidents. Happy with the 3 points - now need to pop the Plymouth bubble tomorrow!!

nah - still confident of a 10 point win.

It does seem like incredible bad luck. Best wishes to Kauko for a speedy recovery. Silver linings for the Tigers though are that you managed to replace a 6.5 rider with a 7.3 rider days before he was due to drop to 5.7 followed by replacing the said 7.3 rider days before he dropped to 6.6. So though r/r again may be far from ideal at least its better with r/r for 7.25 rather than r/r for 5.7.

Is the guest in Nicos position with r/r for Rohan? Surely would be best with r/r for Nico so that Danny can take a ride. If Richie is the guest doesnt he fit for either??

the devils/witches match could be the one that decides 6th place.Very impressive from Plymouth in the last couple - but will it be a flash in the pan?

Any reason why youve dragged out that quote shale searcher?? Seems a bit random and with no context!

nah - he heard about the sting but still chose to back the Rebels I reckon!!Still in his 2nd hand Skoda!! wink

Well if anyone spots Najjer Statman Cliffeboy etc in new jags then we will all know the bookies have been taken for a ride!! wink

hope someone tries to use a black one! Bet they wouldnt be allowed! all of the posts on here have been very tongue in cheek. Nobody really cares whether its yellow or yellow/black.Although it does show that teams dont know the rules - which is what causes most of the problems when they arent quite as trivial as this one. PS just for June I havent forgotten about Lunnas illegal yellow helmet cover. 1 minutes madness when buying his new set.Thats ruined our season. (I want those points back) It has been proved it was illegal!! wink

was a bit bizarre - I havent heard any explanation. Would be interested too if anyone knows the reason.

it was back straight off bend 2. Thats after the end of the 'race' in many soeedway heats. wink

Dont think you can be excluded for knocking off your teammate. Good to see Davies up - it didnt look good.

To much info - this is a family forum. lol

hope not. Would only delay the inevitable thrashing the Witches are due to hand out anyway!

R/R it is (club website preview) Listed at 2 so Danny in heat 8

I thought r/r would be the only option but when Chris was interviewed to announce the ban he was talking about guests??? Perhaps the call to the infamous MC member asking for clarification has already been made! lol So we will find out about 7.29 Thursday.

so even after all the rule bending and manipulation the first thing you think of is how to twist a further advantage out of the situation!!

i doubt it. It is common sense though.

Just our luck - you could've signed him last week!!

Good work agent Morris!! You done the Witches fans proud!! Hard luck pussycats!!

but there is no timescale mentioned just that they 'have ridden as an amatuer ' So 1st meeting with no pay and they have fullfilled the criteria

Fair enough June - but as yet we have not had the benefit of forming our own opinions. Thanks for letting us which one we are allowed to have though! wink

Jenga - my post you quoted is not about Rohan. I have accepted his ban a moved on - as have the majority of Witches fans. The SCB found against him and acted accordingly. My post was in response to Outsiders claim that had it been the other way round he wouldnt withhold the footage. So I simply asked IF there was any of the Wilko incident and if so would he please post it. Im happy to take his word if there is none.

So - Outsider Did you record all 15 heats and slow down laps? Do you have footage of 'Wilkogate'? Will you post it?

Independent does not mean a 40% crossover. And by definition if 40% of the SCB are the BSPA it cannot act without interference. Nothing unfounded in any of that.