dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

So again an 'old' average is used to allow the Pussycats even further over the limit by the time the team takes to the track..... thats what was intimated on the Scuuny thread when he was dropped.

How about a Gollob swansong as well???

To Kings Lynn if anywhere apparently.... And he will get a 'protected' heat 4

Congratulations.......

bluff, double bluff and triple bluff?? dont think it was meant as a dig at Bloomy per se. Look at Maccas previous connection you may see why he had a dig at Sigalos.....

because the pussycats team total is actually 44.5+ due to making the changes between the dates of Perry gaining a 5.5+ ave instead of his 3 and it becoming effective.A nuance of the rules - perhaps its one Buster plans to change.... Personally Im not fussed if we make 0 1 or 7 changes and not really bothered if we lose a few more in the rest of 2016 - what I do want is to be entertained in return for my money. That has has been the real disappointement for me this year over and above any results.

an art indeed...... the art of cheating...... a Pussycat speciality??? wink

Id guess the Pusstcats have gained far more from this over the years than they have lost.... Get a proper bloody kerb (it should be compulsory IMO) and it couldnt happen. Think this week shows that when it matters the result was rather predictable......

All the pressure on the Pussycats - its theirs to lose Best I expect is for Witches to sneek a point but a real hammering just as likely. Hope its a cracker whatever the result.

Just to show Im even handed.... Stokes guest count .....1. wink

55- 37 - Panthers wont be caught out early doors two weeks running.

See Mick has joined in and is no longer the 'odd one out'. But with have a 'conundrum' and 'the chase' is on for a new topic to give us all the 'runaround'. Can we succeed in this 'treasure hunt' Without a new topic we will be in 'jeapardy' of slipping off page 1 - 'you have to be in it to win it' The last few days show is doesnt just have to be 'a question of sport'

not heard of that one can you 'give us a clue' what it was about?

just a one off this time i hope youre right. That would be good all round.

having seen this post i realised we are doing Mick a disservice.... he was just too subtle for us but his post was indeed 'pointless'. Very clever really. Top marks Mick. Looks like just BFH for me rather than a speedboat for not getting that one!

you're close - but its not right! wink ps take the pole out from out youre backside and lighten up (with all due respect) or perhaps add something to the debate to bring it back on track (pun intended)

'good game good game' Oh... Had that one 'You dont get anything for a pair - not in this game!'

Are you gonna buy draw tickets and 'let those dollys do their dealing'

Cook guest count..... 1

Lets hope that the next meeting..... 'is so much better than last weeks' and we get a 'good game good game'

Higher? Lower? We've got 2 weeks for this sort of stuff!! lol

too modern for the Foxhall playlist then.....

Neither - its what you do with it.

First one was just a perfect start.Great side on replay shows Cook is still at the point the magnets release. He does move before the tape in front of him due to a 6-9 inch lag to the centre. 2nd was a jump IMO.

Great gutsy performance from Belle Vue. They wanted it more and just git on with it.