dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

All principles are made up "a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning" The literal dictionary definition......

They had a choice to use Lambert - on a ridiculously low assessed average and unavailable in terms of how the guest rule has always been interpreted OR if he was awarded a true figure They had a choice to use Harris who has already ridden in the play offs No point in anymore debate about either really I will likely be I the minority but I will again choose not to part with my cash to see this as it doesn't meet the principles I expect Enjoy yourself

No disagreement from me on the principle of what went on at Peterborough has been a complete crock of rubbish too. A typical speedway shambles Ipswich actually had to go to both Boro and Lynn after each had strengthened where others didn't so I'd hardly say that it was cut and dried that it was only that that Leicester defeat that meant qualification Too many variable to pin it on one instance but carry on with the smoke and mirrors distraction tactics.....

Indeed he should And what happened to the "gentleman's agreement" that was supposedly in place to prevent it despite the regs not ruling it out? Can only assume that means that one of the parties isn't a gentleman.....

Sheffield - Not use an illegal guest (Lambert) for starters. As I say tip of the iceberg and so much more than just the play off picture Ipswich - Potentially should've been only RR available. I even posted on the semi thread that RR was my preferred option. Harris guesting though, whilst undesirable, was 100% within the regs as they stand

Tip of the iceberg..... Just carry on in your see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil bubble

My suggestion for Sheffield wouldn't pass the forum filters

Calm v Panic Fairness v Manipulation Good v Evil Cmon the Witches !

Shameful farce

Doesn't mean it is within the regs though , just that the regs are ignored when it suits

With rain in the air it opens up another potential test for the regs I believe the team trailing at heat 10 can request the match be be curtailed if conditions are poor, the team leading cannot So what if Wolves are leading by 8 after 10 - can Sheffield request it called as the team trailing in the meeting or is it the aggregate score More and more it seems what the regs don't say is taken as most important as opposed to what they do say - it could be vital if the above were to occur.......

Depends who's asking

Nowhere in the regs to prevent it The only part mentioned is not being able to ride for both sides in a 2 legged tie It has been hinted that there is an agreement in place between all parties to prevent it Given the regs are manipulated what chance does a 'gentleman's' agreement have if push comes to shove....

Just an observation - Witches totalled 93 - 4 points less and they lose...... Thank you Jack Smith for your 4 points

Shove it right ya you twonk!!

Wooohoooo!!!

One of those big calls (at least in terms of the current restrictive set up) that a TM has to make I'd say most would've felt Keynan had a better chance to win that race - as it turned out it didn't work out that way Perhaps a little harsh on Danyon who has been sharp focussed and decently quick away recently

He is guesting at No6 and not as a RS

Surprised he has time to worry about such things given how much effort it must take to think of new ways to cheat every week

Muesli Lawson planned in for Tai

Integrity , transparency , consistency Please Mr Morris do your job.......

Good grief - that is bending of the regs at its finest!! Total farce

Oh dear , same old same old!!

Agree - we should have enough but it would be foolish to be complacent

Fairytale result for the Witches Have shown incredible determination and hitting some form when it counts This is far from over though Needs a solid start at the NSS to settle any nerves. Belle Vue capable of pulling off a string of 5-1s against anyone when they get things right