dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Muesli Lawson planned in for Tai

Integrity , transparency , consistency Please Mr Morris do your job.......

Good grief - that is bending of the regs at its finest!! Total farce

Oh dear , same old same old!!

Agree - we should have enough but it would be foolish to be complacent

Fairytale result for the Witches Have shown incredible determination and hitting some form when it counts This is far from over though Needs a solid start at the NSS to settle any nerves. Belle Vue capable of pulling off a string of 5-1s against anyone when they get things right

Bailey by at least a wheel

Need to rip it right up on the track grade If it slickens off Belle Vue will cope much better and improve

Both Hume and Blordorn with rollers off gate 1 weren't spotted by Chris Gay so he is hardly going to be aware enough for that.....

At Foxhall I say you are weakened by a point - albeit with the risk re Blordorn needing to take 2 extra Doyle missing is probably 4-5 points So overall BV are up on the situation

Although in the guest section that contains the 8 day rule that sees Joe Thompson miss out it states that the guest MUST be in a declared 1-7!!

No longer an option to ride under protest - any such disagreements have to be ironed out prior to the night. Once the meetings starts decisions of that nature are final

Confirms how localised the rain can be Speedy is the closest of us 3 but doesn't mean the track of the rain band didn't cross the stadium Not long to find out

Don't know where you are speedy but it shows the rain was very localised and depends whether the rain band hit the stadium Where I am (2ish miles away as crow flies) the rain was so heavy it woke me up and looking out it was monsoon like If that hit the track I expect similar pictures to the May example If so it will be significantly harder to resolve this time as it has been generally wetter and colder so underlying conditions not as condusive No dry sunny and warm day to assist either

So you admit if a 2nd team wanted to use Harris they could. It takes an non-binding gentleman's agreement to prevent it A legal challenge would allow it.....

Another example of the poor regs Within the sub sections that contain the 8 day rule is another that states the guest MUST be in current declared 1-7 In the RS section it states a RS guest MUST NOT be in a declared 1-7 Call it off now

That was a remarkable effort I think every effort will be made to get it on regardless of the impact recent events could have It will be another packed out night with a fantastic atmosphere Whatever will be will be

What about option C. Neither

Can see some logic in that first bit and the possibility of the second unfortunately

If that happens I'd expect it to be Oxford

Can see one big league using Championship averages and a limit around 35/36 plus a RS at 7 or 39 if averages used for all 7....

You can have a guest for one of the top 3 but I thought if two were out it was one guest and RR that had to be used rather than a guest for both

Does that section still exist in the regs? There was such a line stating a rider COULD be awarded a true average despite not having ridden the normally required minimum Don't know if it's still in there. I don't remember it EVER being utilised

But reassessed is still assessed. It was reassessed - incorrectly maybe but reassessed all the same

Belle Vue to their credit have shown the ability to run in conditions that other tracks couldn't cope with (far from ideal but possible) Given this and the complications (TV , further date extensions etc) that a postponement would cause I would expect it to go ahead unless Noah turns up with his ark