Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
  • Posts

    17,883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Everything posted by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  1. Assuming no change on conversion rate and home grown reduction - 3.02
  2. Congratulations on being a special kind of stupid
  3. It would be 3 unless anything changes at thd AGM
  4. I've just come in from the shed having spent a couple of hours with a piece of 4x2 that shows greater understanding He may or may not be out of his depth but in the team listed he is the RS so does not carry any average and therefore irrelevant to the debate Each team has that young Brit in that place The No6 position does form part of the team limit and it is there that the minimum standard requirement is pertinent Now Cooper may or may not struggle in that position. If he excels even I would be delighted. By crikey we could do with a dozen more like him! However he is rather the exception So again, the Premiership is not the place for 2 point newcomers in the No6 position
  5. It's not about the principle of if someone should have a higher average in the Championship - that's very obvious What its about is ensuring only suitable riders take team spots in the Premiership It shouldnt be a set up that has 2 point newcomers who in 99% of cases would be woefully out of their depth. It should be about higher standards and riders capable of being competitive If you can't see that logic then your brain is 2 points short of a team limit
  6. You said it makes no sense - I pointed out why it does
  7. I would think it is because the desire is to have riders that are of a standard fit to be in the top league rather than filling a team with fodder to gerrymander the remaining places Personally with a RS position in place I would say that the other reserve should actually have to be at least 4 points let alone 3 or even2! (and non Brits should not be allowedto drop below this figure) The other point in this which I will put forward in a devil's advocate role (because I understand the attraction of wanting the best for your team) This shows some of the reason why the sport in the state it is - despite all that has gone on, and the league all but falling apart, (not out of the woods yet) the first serious chat about team building involves how the regulations may be changed/manipulated in order to give a team an advantage And we wonder how we got to this point.....
  8. Re teams - Here's a straw - keep on clutching!! Re stadia etc - very valid point
  9. Apologies if I missed something from you I'm sure I've seen the sign them but allow them to miss away meetings as necessary put up Mute point anyway as none of these are signing up for an any day of the week league
  10. I think one big league is absolutely inevitable (unfortunately imo) However if/when it happens it has to just be what it is from what's available - no making up rules like letting some riders ride in home meetings only etc Something like that is more ridiculous than a 5 team league
  11. I don't see that as cooperation but more capitulation and manipulation
  12. It is utter fantasy that Belle Vue could've joined one big league and named Bewley or Kurtz Even with a ludicrous situation of them turning up for any weekend away fixture without them being "accomodated" what's the point The home teams uppirters don't see them - ripped off. Belle Vue have to race without them- ripped off Take into account they would be on 12 points averages in a team total needing to be not much above 30 and it means Belle Vues travelling team would likely be 7x 4 pointers One big league would have to exclude (whether by design or reality) the top stars and indeed ALL those in Poland (2027 will mean no choice anyway) So also take out Lidsey, Brennan,Ellis, Cook, Blordorn etc etc Teams built to 30 with 3/4 NDL standard
  13. Nothing is more precious and valuable than time and family - particularly when where you have been working couldn't give 2 sh!ts if you were there or not At 54 I've recently exited a job after 36 years and if I have any say in it have no plans to work again and if I do it will be on terms that suit me
  14. Starting point would be teams built in region of 30 point total on current Championship terms and each containing 3 or 4 NDL standard riders
  15. I can certainly accept the sentiment that there is not a significant enough difference between the 2 leagues (due to the number doubling up) but not that the Premiership is simply the Championship plus 6 elite riders Championship No1s are 3rd heat leaders and even second strings in the Premiership You have Premiership reserves and even the RS slots who are heat leaders in the Championship Premiership teams are the equivalent to 55-60 points in Championship terms
  16. Thread at 298 posts - if every Scunthorpe fan makes one themselves that could double by the start of the season
  17. As with so many suggestions that at face value seem interesting and innovative once you scratch through the surface there are often huge holes which are as bad/worse as the situation intended to resolve Like the one big league brigade thinking it will be at current Championship standard etc Change is inevitable, imperative and over due but the solution will never be a concensus of agreement I fear that those with the decision in their hands have it in them to reach agreement and implement it smoothly
  18. They would find a way to eff it up Perhaps field an ineligible rider and get disqualified
  19. Please see my clarification post My apologies that you couldn't envisage the full meaning and the intended impact
  20. Too nice - they are used to having w@nkers at No1
  21. I have no disdain whatsoever for the Championship or any team within it and Ipswich is not perrfect (and was far from it in the past) I agree big changes are needed - let's hope they are made and that they work
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy