dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Yes but the Champioship won't vote for that as they want their cake and to eat it Less doubling up and/or a change in the multiplier is required There was a plan to move it gradually from 1.5 to 2 but as with so many positive proposals it was soon dropped

If the limit is 37 for 6 on average each team will increase by 2 points ish even with no real improvement from anyone Utter madness continues To start the ratchet of improvement it needs to be at least 40 for the top 6

Very naughty to amend a quoted post - against forum rules I believe 😁 No such thing as poaching - no assets anymore and 1 year contracts for self employed riders

Well I suppose I do have the time now I've retired Not sure I have the patience though!

And will always be the case whilst team limits are set below what it takes to win a meeting It means season after season averages inflate and eventually if you keep inflating something it reaches the point it goes POP! Team total needs to be at 42 as a basic Below that you weaken the product gradually Raise the limit and over time the quality can rise - so long that quality is available willingly and able

Depends on the contract - no reason why they can't be exclusive It is common practice for contracts to exclude working elsewhere or require permission - particularly in the same sector

Sounds like a plan so long as it means no doubling up/down

This,and any regulation,isn't (or at least shouldn't) be about 1 rider now (Lambert) At present this possibly has more impact on the likes of Rushen,Cairns etc If it is considered important to provide stability then it should be introduced Comparison with football is pointless and irrelevant - although England Rugby did (possibly still do) have a similar policy meaning a few high profile players were not picked for the international side

If that is the case then BSPL/SCB/ACU needs to stick to their guns and revoke his licence, not consider him for any competition or nomination and move on That then needs to be a permanent move - he may not need any of that now but if/when he may do in the future it has to still be in effect

I believe the same requirement is in place in Sweden,Denmark and Poland regarding riding in their domestic league in order to gain start permission elsewhere - I don't hear such an outcry from them

If that sort of money appears again use part on the middle guys and put an end doubling up Set a real differential between the leagues

Doesn't that just sum matters up perfectly....

Congratulations to The Aces Thoroughly deserved champions

If/when there is a paying TV deal that would be a good start point for use of funds

Offer exclusive contracts and stop doubling down

So the majority continue to bury their heads in the sand and piggy back off a handful to subsidise their hobby

On that basis theres nothing to stop the line being a metre wide and by your definition being on it would still be on track... I'd say its quite clear - the chalk marks the inner edge of the track surface Therefore the track ends as soon as the line starts

In Speedway the line belongs to the infield - on the line is off the track and should result in exclusion

But switched to a British licence as the German Federation wouldn't nominate him in the GP qualifiers when he needed it Have cake and eat it comes to mind....

You know what let's just say f**k it and not bother Close the Premiership and run a semi pro Championship Easier all round

One line follow the leader in all bar a couple Very dull in general apart from the score staying close

Simon at 5? 😃

There must be a nice clear week in December that suits Belle Vue - let's settle on that for them....😜

Surely Monday just becomes the first leg Belle Vue will have to suck it up - can't just keep rearranging the dates

I assume everyone else gets the little ad prompts on each thread Interesting that this one has 'find riding gear' attached 😆