Gazc

He must be on our payroll as well according to some people .

Superior.

I had him as well and the more I thought about it there would be more chance of Wolbert coming back than Berge.

So you keep saying but for how long can this be continually brought up there is only so many years that they can bring it up before it is part off history folklore, we have only agreed with them 496 times in the last three years or so it is very very tiresome now.

Average is against him really depends on how Stewart decides what way to go with the team building but as we bought him last year then i tend to think that it was a long term strategy regards to Richard.

My bad i suppose a Space cadet would prefer those.

Must be on the payroll as a paid sh*t stirrer 2 can's of Coke & a packet of Monster Munch every Friday depending what has been spouted from one week to the next.

PMSL heaven forbid Blobby posting non-truth's but that was a quality post i would be proud off .

No you are right Blobby it wasn't at the Dance it was at the Edinburgh Video night last year and you were able to name some off our signings last year were you not now i am not one to look at previous post's but i quote. Was told by someone who knows people in the know at Glasgow who find's these things out before they get officially announced. unquote Now as we are fixated by all accounts the above post you made last year is more than idle chit chat amongst friends is it but perish the thought that you lot are interested at what goes on at Glasgow. Now Dekker has aired his opinion and i respect that he has said his piece and to be fair he has stood by that but by all accounts you were told according to the post not a discussion as you put it but hey ho it appears i twist thing's when it suits but it is discussion when the the boot is on the other foot.

Should have asked Blobby then surprised he hasn't retired with a lottery win as it is about the only thing he doesn't know.

That is your opinion as how you see it which is fine my opinion is different the way i see it. Out of curiosity who asked them the question regard's Glasgow at an Edinburgh Dance on our team building plan's and were able to tell them who we were signing wasn't a Glasgow fan by any chance as if it was i may get myself along to this year's dance to find out our team for next year.

Not twisting anything here Dekks i asked you the question after you told George they were not interested in us. So if they aren't interested why discuss us no big deal to me either way as they have no influence as to what goes on at Glasgow. But don't say they are not interested as they clearly are.

You never know think Masters will step up to the plate solves part off the problem of points trimming due to the averages.

All he had to say is i would prefer not to discuss Glasgow as i am not interested in them but he didn't he started discussing our team building plans at a public gathering for Edinburgh i would say that is a fixation when you are at your own clubs dance but would prefer to discuss your rivals. So just to clarify when we discuss Edinburgh it is a fixation. When one off your directors discuss Glasgow at an Edinburgh function it is just being interested. Or not as you told George. So Dekks what is it. Is Alex Interested in us. Is Alex not interested in us. Is he fixated enough to discuss us at your team's dance. Can't have it all way's surely just to suit , you have said they were not interested in Glasgow then you confirmed that they did discuss us but now we are fixated. If it wasn't so one-sided it would be funny. You have just made a complete and utter fool of yourself here simple and this is what you come back with. At least in my World i wouldn't say something and 4 post's later say the complete opposite and try and backtrack by posting this response because what else can you come back with.

So they were/are interested then bit off a turnaround from your previous quoted post to George saying they weren't but you have now confirmed that they were discussing Glasgow at an Edinburgh dance. Thanks for clearing that up.

Really to progress his career this was the only desicion he could make he will be a loss to Edinburgh and the PL in general quality rider that deserves to be successful.

Really not the way i view it Alex Harkess according to Blobby was more interested in discussing our team building at the EDINBURGH dance at the end off last season and there not that interested. If that's showing no interest then i can't wait to see what happens when they are. Or on the other hand surely Blobby isn't making thing's up. Just double checked the spelling on his surname as i am sure Cyclone will .

Don't know if you are obsessed with Barker or Glasgow how many threads have you spoke about this now i will tell you again we have not officially signed anyone yet.

Think the chuckle bros would have a coronary with that line up and Blobby would be on 2 weeks into the season on how unhappy the riders are at pumping all before them , and are earning too much point's money , and would like to donate half to the Edinburgh Begging bowl fund re-introduced for next season. Que the magic Al response .

It may well be with the talk off all these rider's wanting to come North Barker etc that we may go down the route off a more balanced top 5 and meaning we don't use Richard on 9.12 personally i would have Rich back but averages may dictate how we go. 1 Aaron Summers 8.37 2. James Sarjeant 5.00 3. Nick Morris 7.91 4. Richie Worrall 6.84 5. Ben Barker 7.56 6. Rob Branford 3.40 7. Zach Wajiknecht 3.00 Total 42.08 but you would be relying on one off your reserves to kick on just a thought. But on the plus side you have 4 heat leader's with three potential No 1s and young James adding 1 - 1.5 on to his average now he has a full PL season under his belt.

Definitely over Barker.

Surely Dyson is at the wind up someone please tell me yes .

True George he has had a lot to contend with last season we are all guilty off knee jerk reactions , but the bigger picture is that Nick has had a difficult time with a combination off contribuiting factors which clearly affected him. If Nick can get over all off this then on a sub 8 average i would have him back next season in a heartbeat.

You are correct a lot off Nick's dip in form especially at home would have been down to the terrible injuries suffered by Darcy. Also have to remember that Nick and Darcy were childhood friends and brought up together he is still very young himself and nobody really know's how much off an impact this would have had on him. As far as Blobby goes he usually comes on a Glasgow thread claiming he know's this & that about Glasgow speedway and there riders what he fails to comprehend is none off us actually care what he claims to know as it is usually a negative spin on Glasgow speedway we know what to expect from him.

You should spout your s*it on all things you claim to know to someone that actually cares. You should try an Edinburgh thread as they are the only ones that listen to you.