mdmc82

?? Verdict can take up to 45 days so still a while yet.

Yes. They have lots of options, magic being the best. It's Pooles choice to wait for Ward when they could be announcing a more commited team without him. We all know that the team that start the season won't be the one they finish with so they could declare team without him.

After the hearing they have 45 days to give a verdict. It's only been 2 weeks.

Agree. Including ward if he thinks 2 weeks equals 45days. He needs to learn how to count instead of trying to get people to feel sorry for him.

That's not the FIM fault. Blame that on poole and Ward. Middlo is the one who have not let his back up riders ride elsewhere. Would have been much easier to have Magic in the team rather than Ward. He's more commited, better role model and just as good a rider without the distractions.

Which teams are waiting?Only Leicester have a rider still to announce. Only Poole are waiting and if they are silly enough to build their team around one rider who let them down big time then that's their own fault.

They have up to 45 days to give him an answer so haven't done anything wrong. Hearing was only last week.

So the big question is still, if he is a NL asset then who gets priority lol. 😄

that will be the case if the fixture is rearranged and not an original one

so does that mean Peterborough get priority or Wolves?

Think King's Lynn are waiting on the fitness of Ashley Morris

the rule has now been confirmed that if the rider isnt riding for their parent club then priority is with the club in the same league as his parent club (not who he signed for first) An example of this is Edward Kennett. He is riding for Lakeside (EL) & Rye house (PL) As his parent club Coventry are an EL club, this means Lakeside will get priority over fixture clashes

BELLE VUE Cook (Edinburgh) Stead (Sheffield) Worrall (Belle Vue) Stefan (Belle Vue) COVENTRY King (Coventry) Robson (Coventry) Sarjeant (Coventry) KING'S LYNN Kerr (King's Lynn) LAKESIDE Kennett (Lakeside) Lawson (Glasgow) Ellis (Lakeside) Birks (Sheffield). LEICESTER Auty (Scunthorpe) Lambert (Leicester) POOLE Newman (Poole) Starke (Somerset) SWINDON Howarth (Workington) Morris (Swindon) Rose (Swindon) Wright (Somerset). WOLVERHAMPTON Wells (Wolves) Blackbird (Peterborough?). Edited by mdmc82, Today, 06:52 AM.

Really. Literally took 10mins if that. Like to help. 😄

I think Blackbird is a Ips Kings Lynn own Lambert which means Leicester get priority. Stefan is a coventry asset. I thought Starke was a Somerset asset? If so then double up priority during clashes would look like this: BELLE VUE Cook (Edinburgh) 4 Stead (Sheffield) 2 Worrall (Belle Vue) Stefan (Belle Vue) COVENTRY King (Coventry) Robson (Coventry) Sarjeant (Coventry) KING'S LYNN Kerr (King's Lynn) LAKESIDE Kennett (Rye House) 7 Lawson (Glasgow) 4 Ellis (Lakeside) Birks (Sheffield). 13! LEICESTER Auty (Scunthorpe) 6 Lambert (Leicester) POOLE Newman (Poole) Starke (Somerset) 5 SWINDON Howarth (Workington) 4 Morris (Swindon) Rose (Swindon) Wright (Somerset). 10 WOLVERHAMPTON Wells (Wolves) Blackbird (Peterborough?). 3 Number next to name is how many possible clashes (without rain offs)

Kennett actually did cheat and disappoint the bees fans

Kennett is a coventry asset although think most of us bees fans would gladly trade him for Garrity 😉

Thanks.

Yes it includes FTD

Yes but if the rider is not riding for his parent club then the league his parent club is in gets priority.

How may fixtures is Blackbird due to miss due to clashes?

Thanks. X

Where will Barker be as not in EL?

What happens with Blackbird as he is owed by a NL club as Eastbourne didn't fold so not a BSPA asset.

It has been confirmed today that when a rider is not a asset of the EL or PL club he rides for , the league of his parent club will get priority in fixture clashes.