Firstly I am so glad to hear the lads are going to be ok.
Can I just ask, does the referee have to give a meet/match report to a governing body and if they do is it available for public viewing?
Personally I thought it was completely unprofessional of the referee,(and the teams) to stand in the middle of the track having heated arguments on whether the track was rideable or not. He should have done an inspection himself and then taken it behind closed doors with the team managers and the captains.
There will rarely be a referees decision that suits both sides, that is why there has to ref's there in the first place. However once his decision has been made then that should be
final.
I know some of the lads did not want to continue because of injuries, and I know Jon took a heavy knock in one of the heats, but if he just decided he wasn't going to ride the remainder of the races ( as he suggested in his tannoy interview) will he now be open to disciplinary action either from his team or from the governing body?
I have also noted people mentioning about why the racing was stopped at 10:22 and not continued through to curfew 10:30pm... why, if they are saying the track was unrideable/unsafe/dangerous and the meet should have been abandoned are they now arguing the racing should have been continued ? Confusing.
Or is the fact the meet was 'called' before the curfew cut off is this going to be a grounds to have the meet declared 'void'
Not trying to cause any trouble just trying to get to grips with all legislations and rules of speedway.