waiheke1

Milik is better than Brady so hardly the end of the world if you get "stuck" with him.I presume after the first averages there would be a revised conversion of say 1.25 for new riders? In which case I would be amazed if kurtz wasn't a lower average than what Milik achieves.

Which is ridiculously low. He should be at least a 7 converted to 9.8. If you didn't ride here in 2016 it should be based on poland/sweden. But fair play to Poole if they can get him on 7.94. That's how you build a championship winning team.

Darcy seemed to manage it ok, but then he was "something special."

Milik would be miles better than either of those options, though it would be farcical if he came in on a 2 year old average.

Mort,peter collins, the Morans, Emil Darcy nicki pedersen Kenny Carter Andy smith declan Eccles

Many thanks

I think Shovvy is the only poole fan so far on this thread to pick Poole as the likely champs?

Poole

Hi Would anyone have the heat results for the following Aces home meetings: Sheffield on October 3rd Cradley on October 18th (2nd meeting of a double header i believe) Many thanks

Except he is on a hl average so won't be "lower down the order"! Surely Schlein is more likely to score well?!?

Because prolonged legal battle could cripple a small publication long before courts reached a verdict?

Yes. So why did you post that the main thing is that there are no breaks/fractures?

Richie worrall looks poor value on that average as dies Jacobs, so I'd agree with that. Steve Worrall surely will be kept though, not particularly good value on that average, but probably comparable to the likes of garrity and Ellis in that they will likely drop around 1-1.5 off their starting average. Wheras I could see Richie and Jacobs dropping 30% off their averages.

Have to say that side is better than somerset, but that would be about it. Would be ok at home but awful away. Etter than any pl side though

Sometimes the only pragmatic option is to smile and say "thank you" when what you really want to say is "f%ck you." Suspect that may be the case here...

Wouldn't be the first time flange had posted a derogatory comment about someone's wife/kids...

The minimum is 2. No maximum though I guess technically 7.14 is the max value.

Interesting. He's known as "enigmatic" but those averages are remarkably consistent. Averaged between 5.08 and 6.14 for 8 consecutive seasons. Of course I'm aware that tgat could often be two storming wins and could stone cold lasts! Or a double digit score followed by a duck egg.

It if 50% of people watch through illegal streams, that's going to mean significantly less advertising revenue and significantly less chance of the series being renewed. Which means increased chance of everyone who work on that show needing to find something else. I do consider 3pm kick offs - or other situations where there is no legitimate alternative to view - to be a different category.

Let's say the meeting had gone ahead and was completed. Belle vue tell the council there are issues with the track. The contractor says "what do you mean issues? You've successfully held a meeting, in line with the agreed schedule,our obligations are completed." Would belle vue have been able to successfully get the council to arrange the extensive remedial work, or would council have sided with the contractor and any further track work needing to be funded by the aces promotion?

Agree. But he received only 3 out of 5 nominations, whras the riders ahead of him received at leadst 4 niminations. I ranked him top of the riders with three nominations.

How about this then for 69-88. The top 9 riders were unanimously picked by all 5 people that contributed a list. The next 6 were selected by 4 out of 5, and the final 5 received 3 nominations. Only one person (yours truly) lranked the riders in order, so within those three categories I've used my own discretion to rank them. Open to suggestions on re-ordering. The only main anomlay in my view is that Anders Michenek should be higher, but as he was not a unanimous nomination (and he was in fact only included by gustix as a replacement for two removed riders) i have included him only as "top" of the riders whjo received 4 nominations: 1 I Mauger 2 H Nielsen 3 O Olsen 4 B Penhall 5 E Gundersen 6 P Collins 7 M Lee 8 K Carter 9 S Moran 10 A Michanek 11 D Jessup 12 B Briggs 13 J Pedersen 14 D Sigalos 15 P Crump 16 M Simmons 17 C Morton 18 T Knudsen 19 S Ermolenko 20 B Sanders Possible people could rank the above list from 1-20, and from that we could re-order?

You are very sweet starman, but not my type. Care to point out which part of my post was inaccurate?

So you are saying sky shouldn't provide a service to their subscribers (ability to view online) because of the risk the streams will be pirated? They do block none subscribers from viewing the content, the issue is it is impossible to stop the content from being restreamed by these "pirates. " I'm not having a dig at people who view such streams, but I really font see how anyone can deny that it is theft. There is going to be a generation which grows up having known nothing but the ability to watch everything FOC and that will obviously result in fundamental change to industries such as sports, movies and TV, where majority of revenue has been based historically on the ability to charge customers to view it.

Noone has denied gardening happens, you were "jumped on" because you claimed it didn't happen in the past, which is patently false.And if you've taken this post as a serious suggestion, that's setting new standards, even for you.