Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

waiheke1

Members
  • Posts

    6,693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by waiheke1

  1. You can't really use the 1.4 though. You'd expect an average rider to hit around 82% of their average, given teams will drop from 50 to around 41. Sedge is hitting under 80% and hence can be said to not be riding to his average.I wouldn't change him though, happy with the team.
  2. Surely the issue is the ridiculous rule that puts the responsibility on the opposition, and not the authorities, to detect any illegality on a named line up?
  3. ok fair enough, Skidder1 had posted only in thr pits.But I agree, it was picked up on here immediately that no guest was allowed, why did it take the authorities longer? Why did they allow Schlein to illegally guest for Riss against Poole?
  4. So if a whole team had not yet ridden sufficient meetings they could vexreassessed down from 50 to just over 35 (removal of 1.4 nultiplier). And then have 7 extra points to build with? Seems well thought through to me...
  5. You asked what scbs point was. I explained his point for you, even though it required no explanation for anyone else. Answering your question is a dig?
  6. Yes the point is why wasn't Brady told when the decision was made? Not waiting til he got to the meeting?
  7. The only reason I can see is in relation to rule 16.5.2.2 where without that rule it would seem only rr would be available. If the intention of 18.10.1 is to allow either guest or rr, why statr if permitted by 18.10?
  8. maybe bsck in the day, but these days I'd be surprised if promotions are paying too much in Tax even on accurately stated revenue ...And tbh attendance figures alone don't tell the taxman much, a 2000 attendance could include 500 kids and 1000 concessions.
  9. But I still don't understand the confusion18.10.1 refers back to 18.10 which clearly states the facility for missing 2-5 is rr. Of course I also understood that once approved by the scb the guest could only be changed of the opposing manager objected within a certain time frame, which while a ludicrous rule, doesn't seem to be the case here. And surely it should have been evident to all that the Danish national champs are not an fim world championship event? So which part of the rule do you think is not clear?
  10. Madness to ditch tungate imo. There will be plenty of points avaliable if somerset want to strengthen, and you won't get a better rider than tungate on a 5 point average or whatever he is in at that stage.
  11. The rules are clear. Poole can have a guest as Kerr is a double upper riding for his other team. Somerset were not allowed a guest for a missing member 2-5 who is not a double upper.In this case the rules are clear I don't know why people are struggling with them.
  12. For those accusing scb of trolling, this is what he does when proved wrong. Some of you might want to consider doing the same...
  13. That would be the rule that scb and others have been pointing out since the guest was announced then...
  14. Well the rules are pretty clear that somerset were not entitled to a guest so not sure why you are surprised. Ah, Poole fan, now I understand 😉
  15. They are allowed a facility but not a guest. Rossiter clearly has not read the rule book.
  16. If it is correct that no multiplier is applied. Surely the bspa can't be that thick though...
  17. Tbf he did mention Howarth passing Worrall in heat one, that must have been it?
  18. Clegg is clearly now not going to meet the criteria for a new average. So presumably he will stay at 4.34 or alternatively he could become a 2 (minimum possible average, he is averaging below this) which would permit a like for like swap with Bailey. Stars currently looking like they will have a couple of spare points
  19. BWD was pretty impressive thete for Swindon, I'd assume that's the reason he's been picked ahead of RR.
  20. Can only be based on official green sheets surely?
  21. Agreed. Yet we've already had Schlein guesting for Riss despite having a higher average. Obviously no one at the SCB is worried about teams following the rule book.
  22. BV can only choose rr. Somerset should not be allowed a guest for hougaard it should be rr. Guest only for missing du or number 1 in the main body of team.
  23. It seems rules on guests are being ignored this season, and unless the opposition manager spots it immediately illegal guests are allowed
  24. Belle Vue do get a facility for Bjerre. Rr is a facility Absence of Bjerre definitely weakens the Aces given that his rides cannot be taken by fricke or cook. Aces should still win by 10 though
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy