waiheke1

2018 team:C holder Batch schlein KK Bridger Bailey plus whoever fits?

Woffy 40 more Fricke 20 more Pawlicki 60 more Zagar 20 more Janowski 40 more Dudek 10 more Doyle 10 less

But Doyle on a 13 made sense. Dropping the team building limit by 16% and removing a multiplier of 1.4 to made no sense. Perhaps baffling was the wrong word. Predictably ludicrous perhaps a better description?

Surely there is a grading system, averages. Thj has been rubbish and therefore has a low average. Don't think anyone can legitimately have an issue with THJ guesting for BWD. It's the rules that allowed you to get Musielak in without any multiplier to his old average which are utterly baffling.

. .

Which part are u denying? That you are edwards22? That edwards22 is registered as a female? The first one you've confirmed. The second one is a fact. So....?

Bargain. Highly recommend it to anyone who hadn't read it, especially at that price

And tbf at that stage Loram was not an automatic pick. He'd only appeared in the 92 final at that stage.

Yeah, why hold it at by far the best racetrack in the country?

I thought Tragedy was the better read, but would certainly recommend the Alan carter one as well, certainly gives some insight into why Kenny was the way he was.

Available to view anywhere?

So edwards22 is you? Or your nephew?

Yep

Agree. He posted an article from the 50s recently which was an interesting piece. It's a shame someone with so much historical knowledge chooses to troll with 80% of his posts rather than sharing memories and views on the greats he saw live.

Nope. This was the post Eric and Jan o era and they finished runners upEngland came 4th though! It's just symptomatic of the poster in question that he riles even mild mannered posters like Chunky and Dave Allen etc. the bloke is a troll but I'm sure someone will arrive on their white steed shortly to his defence...

and I'm confused. Is he saying I posted a homophobic slur or you did? And one of us liked it? I'm 100% certain I haven't done either.I guess he's trolling again...

I find it staggering that a bloke whose IQ must hover somewhere around the team building limit sees fit to take the piss out of someone because they have a sleeping disorder. No surprise that Flange does as he's clearly a troll and/or genuinely nasty piece of work.

Yeah you are right fred. Say I release a new product and in the first year sales grow from 100 units to 1000 units. In the 2nd year I market the product differently and sell 9000 units. I should call myself an utter fool for having used such an unsuccessful marketing strategy that has hamstrung my business performance and seen a decline with growth. I've got you Fred, it's a shame all those promoters across a variety of sports are too foolish to see it as well.

Was Briggs better than Olsen? Knutson better than Michsnek? Craven better than PC? Boocock better than Simmons? Or were those riders more successful because they weren't up against Mauger.I'd say there's much more of a case that Eric and Hans had things easier as they picked up titles in an era shorn of the riders who should have been their top rivals (penhall sigalos carter lee sanders all lost prematurely, and you could arguably add Kelly Moran to that list as a rider who for other reasons wasn't the title contender he could have been).

Yep, no dispute there. BUT the figures clearly don't show the immediate decrease that Flange claims. Figures are higher after the play offs were introduced bs is say it's probable that they are one of several factors behind the increase.

You are so right. If those foolish promoters had not introduced the play offs they would no doubt have an average crowd today somewhere around the 8.7million mark...

But the same riders will now be averaging around 41. So if 37 again it would mean a further weakening of approx 10%

It's patently obvious that the figures in Sweden show that the play offs have seen a increase in attendances. So Flange either genuinely has no understanding of basic maths or economics, or is trolling again. I guess if he's on this thread at least it might stop his trolling on the Wolves threads. Though his anti play off rhetoric is just as tedious as his repeated comments about the "horror track"though less obnoxious than his repeated personal attacks on Brum.

Surely here though it is swindon who made the initial error in making an illegal substitution. I recall a rugby league game where the result was reversed as one team had 14 players on the field for 30 seconds. 2 points should be deducted and it's a farcical rule that the extra point aces could have scored is not added

True, but does anyone claim PCs world title says devalued by Olsen being missing from the field? Or Lee with Mauger absent - in both cases the reigning champ missing, as was Jan O in 92