I support the original Poster in this.
I have said it until I am blue in the face - the Tracks these days are mostly, through force of circumstance, old Tracks (circa: 1928) and have grown too small and tight for the Bikes that are expected to Race on them.
To me - you can either change the Tracks, or you can change the Bikes. Obviously changing the Tracks is far too expensive and impractical. It would be expensive to change the Bikes too - but not impossible. This constant striving for more speed is literally killing people. Many will not like what I say - but it is true. The answer must be to slow the Bikes down.
If you lost say 10 seconds off Race times due to Bike alterations, as long as everyone was riding similar equipment - I don't understand where the excitement will be lost. Speedway was very exciting fifty years ago, it is very exciting now too, but crucially, with the higher speeds making it much more dangerous.
Speedway is a very dangerous Sport anyway, and I fail to see the point of making it even more dangerous by increasing the speeds. I know people will say that is progress and we must go forward - but at what cost? The higher speeds are making Speedway Tracks throughout the Country unfit for purpose.
How will supporters feel when Tracks may have to be closed because they are unable to cope with the speed of the Rocket Ship that the current Speedway Bike is becoming?
The death of one Rider is too many. Do we not owe it to them to, at least, try to minimise the risks.
I have seen far too many very seriously injured Riders or worse in my time watching Speedway, you will never eliminate the risks altogether - but we have to try.