Tsunami

:lol:

You're getting too soft.

Quite agree. I think a ban for the rest of 2011, and a suspended ban for 2012 is about right and gives warnings to anybody else thinking of cheating in the future.

All bikes are checked for legality at every meeting by the now mandatory TWO machine examiners. Non conforming bikes are removed from the pits and can't be ridden in that meeting. During a meeting, refs can request the ME's to check the size of carbs immediately after usually winning a pre specified race. There are checks going on at all times during a meeting.

What a ridiculous comment.

Never known a mechanic that had the power or the permission to radically change or do something that was cheating, without doing it with the riders knowledge or permission. It's beyond reality.

Quite agree with you Rob.

Correct, but iceman mentioned bikes that were 'in his possession'.

Any bike found 'illegal', could be argued that he had only used it in practice rather than a meeting.

Come on. Surely you can see the 'irony' of this matter.

No need to. It is only the bike that was used and then examined that can be illegal. Any other bike is not technically illegal unless used, or tried to be used, in competition.

Excellent response from the club. I was told before the season started that the standard test was to poke a knitting needle up the middle of the exhaust. Probably opening the exhaust up to confirm the baffles have been tampered with.

So you made a false accusation, stating incorrect reasons, and, despite others thinking it deserved an apology from you to me, you still shout your mouth off to those posters, digging deeper with every post. You really are an odious creature with no redeeming features. Others can read your replies and make their own mind up about me and also about you as a person. Let others decide, but I think some already have where you are concerned.

:lol:

So no Christmas card this year then. I will leave others to judge your comments above. Common Leicester.

Dream on. You are only making a fool of yourself. Me and SueSpeedilyWhipsJim are 2 different people and I have never spoke to, know or met this poster. Why not ask Phil for the two IP addresses and confirm your paranioa.

Keep laughing as the joke is on you. Paranoia is a very dangerous thing and makes some people say stupid things, like what you have just implied. Playing a victim again.

:lol: Fellow troll.

There's only one pathetic speciman, ranting about obsessions and negativity and it's you. No argument. BTW, Both Rob and I are just as entitled to make genuine comments on this thread as you, unfortunately you don't take that opportunity.

If you use the professional weather site XC Weather you will see that they are only forecasting 1.2mm at about 7.00pm after slight rain for a couple of hours earlier. Always best to look at about 3 sites and average their forecasts. I'm impressed, what you on.

Will DEEK ride, given his foot injury and that we have meetings on both Saturday and Sunday. I would hope not.

Dave Pavitt once said that the money that keeps IOW finacially afloat is made from the increased attendances during a 6-8 week summer period. In the past Dave has asked the IOW to be dropped out of the PT but was told it all or nothing for everyone, therefore there are many meetings at the beginning, and the end of the season, where it is known that there will be losses which are set against the paying summer meetings.

The Northern promoters used to try to get a return for them every year, but the Southern promoters said they didn't have the same interest and that the meetings were too costly to stage. Even an offer of 'well you nomiate yours and we'll hold our qualifying meetings' was always voted out.

That's perfectly fair if there is only a couple of you, but not practical for groups who combine their efforts for the benefit of the group. If it's not for you, then buy them on the day.

Good. We are seats 1 to 28 and usually have big Danish flags with us. Could you put them over the rail for us.