Tsunami

Another one. See my answer to BWitcher above. I was asked a question and I replied. Talk about missing the point.

Excuse me, but I was asked if I thought if the timescale was acceptable and I said no. Nowt to do with overlooking something, an opinion, OK. See my response to BWitcher above, and you will see I have NOT missed the point. Probably you have.

ha ha, I haven't worked for 20 years, and I am not going to start now.

I certainly couldn't live there. Was a dump. Anyway you, get back on thread, whatever it is.

I was in the touristy bits. Are you saying the mundane places are worse.

Whitley Bay actually.

I met Mr Sacker(and family), and stood with them, when we were down for that Cup meeting at the end of 2013, and he seemed a very likeable guy. Had a canny chat with him, and he was a very interested guy. I hope he sticks with you.

No one would want to go on holiday to Bulgaria, and I hear Romania could be worse.

NO. I don't think the timescale is acceptable and SCB also agrees, along with many others including some who have no sympathy for Ward. I have no idea what the BSPA think of the timescales, try asking them. Your attempt to have a go, and try to implicate the SS and BSPA was pathetic and irrelevant.

I was in Bulgaria in November, and the impression I got from looking at the residents was the TWK's comments in many cases were not far from the truth. That's not racist, but very factual of what i saw. Some on here of course will insist that I am racist.

Quite pathetic.

Yes it does, and BWitcher's comments are spot on and timely.

I quite agree. Mind you, when i got him several times it felt so much better to overcome him. I took the Gems team to Worky, and he accused us(me and Kenny) of trying to get the meeting called off late in the meeting due to the sloppy track. An argument started in the pits, in front of the ref, and Thomas had to be dragged away. It was shortly after he had been diagnosed with heart trouble.

Well said.

Oh Dear :- Illustrious Sycophants Lackeys Deluded folk Downright fools Diddleswitch Stupid Dumb card Fiddlesnitch Darcy Love Crew Befuddled Alex Utter ignorance. .....and just because someone has a different point of view. Who said the art of debate is dead.

Sorry if it wasn't you. It was between you and Bruiser McHugh Once again my apols.

Once gain, Why would he say it, what did he have to gain. I was NOT being pro BSPA in the comparison, but when such a criticised organisation has to put up with so much criticism, why not the FIM with outdated and non urgent procedures/responses to their riders. You and others imply 'not fit for purpose' with the BSPA, but the better example of that staying surely is the FIM. Folks on here have intimated Castagnia and FIM 'jaunts' early in this thread, but to read comments now, they seem to have been changed to be paragons of virtue. I might be tempted to vote for them in the General Election. Even Phil Rising has tried to explain things for others, and still had to stand up and defend himself. Just a hanging thread which deserved a fair discussion. I am no hater or lover of Darcy, he has a tremendous talent with a shocking attitude, but comments and criticism has hardly been balanced or fair. Let's hope the much awaited FIM verdict is.

This is not the first time you have said this, so why not spill the beans if it beggars belief. Like I know something you don't know.

And neither do you have any evidence that he wasn't told that. As I have said in answer to Arson, why would he put himself in the situation where he could look foolish if they didn't deliver the verdict in 7 days. He could not gain by saying it, only open himself to ridicule when it didn't happen. And the FIM as expected have done that. Total bollocks mate, just something said to try and devalue what i am saying. Having been there and done it, could be advantages in discussions but not on the BSF. How in what way can my views be pro BSPA when they are not involved, FFS. I do have a strong dislike of both the FIM and FIFA. Would you want to defend either of them on their image and processes. Before this case I guess that most people would share my view, and agree that neither were fit for purpose. But then came along Darcy pissed and drunk at the GP.

Do you really think Darcy could influence such an archaic structure already issued in writing by the FIM. It's not common sense, and not in the realm of possibility, unless Darcy is being given unfair judgement by some on here. Yes. The BSPA make the decisions and get it over in as short a time as possible, rather than stick to a rigid and pathetic timescales, which the BSPA could and would never use. Instead of FIM read FIFA. Set up for their own convenience, rather giving the matter the priority any cases deserve. Suggest you reread some of the info on this thread that is not proven, but been seems to have added for effect. He was 'drunk' apparently. He seems to have been over the meeting limit, but how can others on here interpret that as drunk. Where is their evidence. With your last sentence, I take it you don't do humour.

Totally different context. Edinburgh and Richie might have personal reason to gain for the stance they took/said. Darcy on the other hand just puts his neck on the line if and when the FIM don't make a decision in 7 days. Even Darcy would know the rules with the 45 period. He had nothing to gain by saying it. This whole affair may not look good for Darcy and his stupid actions, but I think the blood thirsty approach and hanging mentality does not show these posters in very good light either. I see nobody has tried to defend their actions when their approach is compared to what would have happened if it was the BSPA and a rider disciplinary procedure. TWK You are too late for the rope. Stacks of posters already in the queue before you judging by previous posters.

That's all very well in programmed meetings, but not right if the EL team rides roughshod over the fixtures of PL teams when they rearrange fixtures. Let's have some fairness and respect for each other.

He knows no different Ian. A man with a child's brain, nothing to add but tries to muddle discussions.

Do you really believe both Middlo and Darcy would say 7 days if it hadn't been indicated. Why would anybody say if they had said if it hadn't. No sense or gain but a handy story for others to get their latch on it. BTW who's got the rope.