szkocjasid

That's a bit of a daft comment. If you're gonna post that the asset system has changed & affects Poole, surely you'd expect forum users to have a discussion about it? That's what the forum is for. So to then not explain the situation seems really odd to me. Why post a "conversation starter" without enough information for people to have a conversation about it?

I think the plan was Castagna for Vuolas, which makes sense. But they couldn't do that while Zagar was in the 1-7. I'm sure when a club drops a rider they can't bring him back "without management committee approval". I'm this case it's not like Birmingham were attempting to fiddle the averages, so I'm 99.99% sure Zagar would be allowed back. Last year Zach Cook was re-signed after being dropped & that was allowed.

Edinburgh can't remove Max from their team till they have a replacement, even if they found one after a week, I assume Max would still have to sit out his 28 day ban. Maybe the rules are to blame for this more than Edinburgh. As for Berwick, I think 2 matches isn't enough for any rider to prove their worth, unless Bastien said he was struggling & wanted to be replaced, think Berwick should've given him longer in the team.

I think if / when Zagar returns it'll be in place of Hume.

I know people like to exaggerate but they would romp the Champ with that side imo

Team looks very weak now. Oxford look stronger imo.

Makes sense

The idea is one of them joins another club. Won't be the first time a top rider has had to change teams due to the points limit, Rickardsson left Ipswich after the 98 treble, Hancock & Hamill split up after racing together at Cradley & Coventry, Poole chose Pedersen over Crump (can't remember if that was due to points limit or GP rider limit). I'm not saying it's ideal, but if the alternative is clubs closing down due to losing money let alone the clubs that may lose their stadium, won't do much good having a superstar team with only 2 or 3 teams to race against.

If grade A is 8.00+ then grade B is 6.00-7.99, means a big difference in team strengths. I'd suggest saying clubs are only allowed 1 x 9+ rider or 2 x 8+ riders, sharing the top riders around.

With Scunthorpe having decent looking reserves, r/r would be a good option.

So did Jason Crump, born in Britain, but after riding for Australia.

That's exactly it, one rider is willing to travel because he wants to make a living as a speedway rider. The other is willing to put his career on hold & hope for a more Southern Champ club? That's how I see it. I'm not having a go at Ablitt, I wouldn't want to travel from the south coast to Berwick for home matches, but with not many clubs these days, it's a risk sitting out of the Champ & only doing NL/NT when you're a 5 point champ rider.

He only has to do better than Vuolas to strengthen the team.

I think everyone knew that pre-season. Would have been impossible to be as strong with the points limit. Despite losing to Plymouth they're still one of the top 4 clubs in the league imo. Biggest difference to last year, is they're amongst the favourites, rather than clear favourites.

Looking at Plymouth's May averages & Klindt's current ave, when Klindt completes 6 matches, Plymouth would have 8.68 points available to replace Cluff! I don't know if there's any heat leaders out there available, but could certainly strengthen the team. That figure will change depending on how many Klindt scores in his next 3 matches, question is can Cluff improve enough to keep his team spot?

Birmingham should've taken the change to talk to him about riding over here regardless, maybe they did?

Can't see Hagon doing well in the top 5. I'd move him to 2, Kemp at 3, Hume at 4. Easier to use Kemp in heat 15, if he's not been in the previous heat imo

When they race Oxford

Yep, agree with that.

I'll get lynched for suggesting this, but have 2 "rising stars" then you only need to fill the other 5 places instead of 6.

Not sure why Gusts only got 3 rides when Killeen got 6. Especially as Gusts finished ahead of Killeen in heat 12. Wouldn't make a difference to the score, but still worth giving Gusts a 4th ride imo.

Looking at the May averages, if Birmingham dropped Vuolas they'd have 7.20 available to replace him. While I don't know where they'd find a heat leader from, even a rider with a 4.51+ allowing Jeppesen to drop to reserve would make the team competitive. That's providing Zagar returns.

If guests put them off, they never would've agreed to show the sport

I totally get what you're saying about Zischke, but bearing in mind it was his first season a 4.71 away average isn't that bad. Had he been 6.71 at home, 4.71 away & 5.71 overall. People would be calling that a decent first season for a new foreign rider. Because he averaged 9.38 at home, it makes his away average look far worse as you naturally compare them. The NSS would seem the ideal track for him in the Prem, not had a great start to the season, could be because he's coming back from injury? But do feel Aces have one of the weaker reserve pairings. As for Rowe, same with the whole Sheffield team, will be interesting to see what they can do away from home. Mind you even if they don't win away, home from will guarantee a play-off spot.

I know Speedway often has daft rules, but I can't imagine there'll be a rule where you have to add 5% & subtract 25% to work out the average available for a guest. I'd hazard a guess that the + 5% at home rule is only when a full facility is allowed.